Belief Revision and Update

Dissertation, Stanford University (1993)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This dissertation is a contribution to the study of belief change from both a formal and computational perspective. Theories of belief change address the following general question: Given an initial database $\Gamma$ and a new piece of information $\mu$ to be incorporated into it, what should the new database be? In this study we focus on two specific types of belief change, revision and update. We ground each of them on a solid semantic foundation, and develop syntactic characterizations and algorithms to compute a number of specific belief change operators instantiating these semantics. ;The study is divided into two parts. The first part addresses the foundational aspects of belief change, specifically the definition of appropriate semantics for revision and update operators. We encode belief update in a non-monotonic temporal framework for reasoning about action and change that makes explicit the temporal evolution of the database, and use this framework to show both the applicability and the limits of some of the most important update proposals in the literature. A very similar approach can be used to capture revision. We develop a "mental situation calculus" to encode the agent's beliefs, and capture revision in terms of the effects of learning the new information in a theory of action very similar to the one used for update, and that allows for a unified treatment of both types of belief change within a single formalism. As with update, we show that the most important proposals for revision found in the literature can be captured in our construction. ;Part 2 is devoted to the computation of updates and revisions of knowledge bases under a variety of specific operators, most of which are special cases of the framework developed in part 1. We develop techniques to systematically characterize all the operators considered, and use the resulting syntactic characterizations to design algorithms for revision and update of CNF, NNF and DNF databases. The algorithms for update are the first of their kind which do not need explicit manipulation or storage of complete models of the knowledge base, and its usefulness for updating large knowledge bases is experimentally demonstrated

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,038

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Belief revision in a temporal framework.Giacomo Bonanno - 2008 - In Krzysztof Apt & Robert van Rooij (eds.), New Perspectives on Games and Interaction. Amsterdam University Press.
Deriving properties of belief update from theories of action.Alvaro Val & Yoav Shoham - 1994 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 3 (2):81-119.
Infinitary belief revision.Dongmo Zhang & Norman Foo - 2001 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 30 (6):525-570.
Dynamic logic for belief revision.Johan van Benthem - 2007 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 17 (2):129-155.
A framework for iterated revision.Sébastien Konieczny & Ramón Pino Pérez - 2000 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 10 (3-4):339-367.
Arrow update logic.Barteld Kooi & Bryan Renne - 2011 - Review of Symbolic Logic 4 (4):536-559.
Deriving properties of belief update from theories of action.Alvaro Vadell & Yoav Shoham - 1994 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 3 (2).
An approximate approach to belief revision.Shangmin Luan, Guozhong Dai & Lorenzo Magnani - 2012 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 20 (2):486-496.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-06

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Deriving properties of belief update from theories of action.Alvaro Val & Yoav Shoham - 1994 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 3 (2):81-119.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references