Replies

Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 66 (1):219–227 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

On the first point, the issue dividing us is this: when Kant seeks to unfold the necessary conditions of experience, what sense of ‘experience’ does he have in mind? I think it is sometimes a thin sense in which nothing more is posited than the bare consciousness of representations. Ameriks thinks it is a thicker sense in which experience involves judgment, perhaps even true judgment, and perhaps even knowledge.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,323

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Review: Replies. [REVIEW]James Van Cleve - 2003 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 66 (1):219 - 227.
Replies. [REVIEW]James Van Cleve - 2003 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 66 (1):219 - 227.
‘Many Minds’ Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics: Replies to Replies.Michael Lockwood - 1996 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47 (3):445-461.
Replies to my critics.Samir Okasha - 2010 - Biology and Philosophy 25 (3):425-431.
Replies to Eleven Essays.W. V. Quine - 1981 - Philosophical Topics 12 (1):227-243.
The problem of natural evil II: Hybrid replies.Luke Gelinas - 2009 - Philosophy Compass 4 (3):560-574.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
34 (#473,178)

6 months
6 (#530,399)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Kant-Bibliographie 2003.Margit Ruffing - 2005 - Kant Studien 96 (4):468-501.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references