Why non-factualists should love conceptual role semantics

Grazer Philosophische Studien 80 (1):1-19 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I argue that conceptual role semantics gives non-factualism the resources to overcome two difficulties: the problem posed by faultless disagreements and the Frege-Geach problem

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,440

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Conceptual role semantics for moral terms.Ralph Wedgwood - 2001 - Philosophical Review 110 (1):1-30.
Conceptual Role Semantics and Naturalizing Meaning.Gábor Forrai - 2008 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 8 (24):337-348.
Conceptual role semantics.Daniel Whiting - 2006 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
The role of 'conceptual role semantics'.Barry Loewer - 1982 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 23 (July):305-15.
(Nonsolipsistic) conceptual role semantics.Gilbert Harman - 1987 - In Ernest LePore (ed.), New Directions in Semantics. London: Academic Press. pp. 55–81.
Conceptual Role Semantics.Ned Block - 1998 - In Edward Craig (ed.), The Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Routledge. pp. 242-256.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-29

Downloads
40 (#391,197)

6 months
6 (#510,232)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references