Groundless Belief: An Essay on the Possibility of Epistemology: With a New Preface and Afterword
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Princeton University Press (1977)
Inspired by the work of Wilfrid Sellars, Michael Williams launches an all-out attack on what he calls "phenomenalism," the idea that our knowledge of the world rests on a perceptual or experiential foundation. The point of this wider-than-normal usage of the term "phenomenalism," according to which even some forms of direct realism deserve to be called phenomenalistic, is to call attention to important continuities of thought between theories often thought to be competitors. Williams's target is not phenomenalism in its classical sense-datum and reductionist form but empiricism generally. Williams examines and rejects the idea that, unless our beliefs are answerable to a "given" element in experience, objective knowledge will be impossible. Groundless Belief was first published in 1977. This second edition contains a new afterword in which Williams places his arguments in the context of some current discussions of coherentism versus the Myth of the Given and explains their relation to subsequent developments in his own epistemological views.
|Keywords||Knowledge, Theory of|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$8.66 used (83% off) $12.88 new (75% off) $49.95 direct from Amazon Amazon page|
|Call number||BD161.W47 1999|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Jonathan Vogel (2004). Skeptical Arguments. Philosophical Issues 14 (1):426–455.
Kai-man Kwan (2006). Can Religious Experience Provide Justification for the Belief in God? The Debate in Contemporary Analytic Philosophy. Philosophy Compass 1 (6):640–661.
Ram Neta (2004). Skepticism, Abductivism, and the Explanatory Gap. Philosophical Perspectives 14 (1):296-325.
Similar books and articles
William P. Alston (1983). What's Wrong with Immediate Knowledge? Synthese 55 (April):73-96.
Paul K. Moser (1989). Knowledge and Evidence. Cambridge University Press.
Michael Williams (2001). Problems of Knowledge: A Critical Introduction to Epistemology. OUP Oxford.
Raul Hakli (2007). On the Possibility of Group Knowledge Without Belief. Social Epistemology 21 (3):249 – 266.
Michael Williams (2003). Are There Two Grades of Knowledge? Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 77 (1):91–112.
Duncan Pritchard (2004). Epistemic Deflationism. Southern Journal of Philosophy 42 (1):103-134.
Michael Williams (2009). The Tortoise and the Serpent : Sellars on the Structure of Empirical Knowledge. In Willem A. DeVries (ed.), Empiricism, Perceptual Knowledge, Normativity, and Realism: Essays on Wilfrid Sellars. Oxford University Press
Ernest Sosa (2003). Are There Two Grades of Knowledge? Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 77 (1):113–130.
Hamid Vahid (2009). The Epistemology of Belief. Palgrave Macmillan.
Michael Williams (1977). Groundless Belief: An Essay on the Possibility of Epistemology. Yale University Press.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?