Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Resistance to extinction of human evaluative conditioning using a between‐subjects design. E. Díaz, G. Ruiz & F. Baeyens - 2005 - Cognition and Emotion 19 (2):245-268.
    Two experiments were conducted to examine whether the resistance to extinction obtained in evaluative conditioning (EC) studies implies that EC is a qualitatively distinct form of classical conditioning (Baeyens, Eelen, & Crombez, 1995 Baeyens, F, Eelen, P, and Crombez, G, (1995a). Pavlovian associations are forever: On classical conditioning and extinction, Journal of Psychophysiology 9 ((1995a)), pp. 127–141.[Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]a) or whether it is the result of an nonassociative artefact (Field & Davey, 1997 Field, AP, and Davey, GCL, (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • Associative learning of likes and dislikes: Some current controversies and possible ways forward.Frank Baeyens, Andy P. Field & Jan De Houwer - 2005 - Cognition and Emotion 19 (2):161-174.
    Evaluative conditioning (EC) is one of the terms that is used to refer to associatively induced changes in liking. Many controversies have arisen in the literature on EC. Do associatively induced changes in liking actually exist? Does EC depend on awareness of the fact that stimuli are associated? Is EC resistant to extinction? Does attention help or hinder EC? As an introduction to this special issue, we will discuss the extent to which the papers that are published in this issue (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  • On the (un-) controllability of affective priming: Strategic manipulation is feasible but can possibly be prevented.Juliane Degner - 2009 - Cognition and Emotion 23 (2):327-354.
  • Associative learning requires associations, not propositions.Frank Baeyens, Debora Vansteenwegen & Dirk Hermans - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (2):198-199.
    We discuss findings on evaluative conditioning (EC) that are problematic for the account of learning, namely, dissociations between conscious beliefs and acquired (dis)liking. We next argue that, both for EC and for Pavlovian learning in general, conditioned responding cannot rationally be inferred from propositional knowledge type and that, therefore, performance cannot be explained.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • No support for dual process accounts of human affective learning in simple Pavlovian conditioning.Ottmar V. Lipp & Helena M. Purkis - 2005 - Cognition and Emotion 19 (2):269-282.
    Dual process accounts of affective learning state that the learning of likes and dislikes reflects a learning mechanism that is distinct from the one reflected in expectancy learning, the learning of signal relationships, and has different empirical characteristics. Affective learning, for example, is said not to be affected by: (a) extinction training; (b) occasion setting; (c) cue competition; and (d) awareness of the CS-US contingencies. These predictions were tested in a series of experiments that employed simple Pavlovian conditioning procedures. Neutral (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • A time course analysis of the affective priming effect.Dirk Hermans, Jan De Houwer & Paul Eelen - 2001 - Cognition and Emotion 15 (2):143-165.