Australasian Journal of Philosophy 92 (2):305-320 (2014)

Authors
David Bain
Glasgow University
Abstract
Pain asymbolia is a rare condition caused by brain damage, usually in adulthood. Asymbolics feel pain but appear indifferent to it, and indifferent also to visual and verbal threats. How should we make sense of this? Nikola Grahek thinks asymbolics’ pains are abnormal, lacking a component that make normal pains unpleasant and motivating. Colin Klein thinks that what is abnormal is not asymbolics’ pains, but asymbolics: they have a psychological deficit making them unresponsive to unpleasant pain. I argue that an illuminating account requires elements of both views. Asymbolic pains are indeed abnormal, but they are abnormal because asymbolics are. I agree with Klein that asymbolics are incapable of caring about their bodily integrity; but I argue against him that, if this is to explain not only their indifference to visual and verbal threat, but also their indifference to pain, we must do the following: take asymbolics’ lack of bodily care not as an alternative to, but as an explanation of their pains’ missing a component, and claim that the missing component consists in evaluative content. Asymbolia, I conclude, reveals not only that unpleasant pain is composite, but that its ‘hedomotive component’ is evaluative.
Keywords Pain  Asymbolia  Affect
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1080/00048402.2013.822399
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

What Makes Pains Unpleasant.David Bain - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 166 (1):69-89.
The Authority of Desire.Dennis W. Stampe - 1987 - Philosophical Review 96 (July):335-81.
Imperative Content and the Painfulness of Pain.Manolo Martínez - 2011 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 10 (1):67-90.
An Imperative Theory of Pain.Colin Klein - 2007 - Journal of Philosophy 104 (10):517-532.

View all 12 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Why Take Painkillers?David Bain - 2019 - Noûs 53 (2):462-490.
Reasons and Theories of Sensory Affect.Murat Aydede & Matthew Fulkerson - 2019 - In David Bain, Michael Brady & Jennifer Corns (eds.), The Philosophy of Pain: Unpleasantness, Emotion, and Deviance. New York, USA: Routledge. pp. 27-59.
Not Only a Messenger: Towards an Attitudinal‐Representational Theory of Pain.Hilla Jacobson - 2019 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 99 (2):382-408.
Recent Work on Pain.Jennifer Corns - 2018 - Analysis 78 (4):737-753.

View all 27 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Place of Pain in Life.Truls Wyller - 2005 - Philosophy 80 (3):385-393.
Imperatives, Phantom Pains, and Hallucination by Presupposition.Colin Klein - 2012 - Philosophical Psychology 25 (6):917-928.
Pains and Sounds.Ivan V. Ivanov - 2011 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 18 (9-10):143-163.
Pains as Reasons.Manolo Martínez - 2015 - Philosophical Studies 172 (9):2261-2274.
What Makes Pains Unpleasant.David Bain - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 166 (1):69-89.
When Pains Are Mental Objects.Abraham Olivier - 2003 - Philosophical Studies 115 (1):33-53.
Painism Defended.Richard D. Ryder - 2015 - Think 14 (41):47-55.
Response to Tumulty on Pain and Imperatives.Colin Klein - 2010 - Journal of Philosophy 107 (10):554-557.
The Penumbral Theory of Masochistic Pleasure.Colin Klein - 2014 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 5 (1):41-55.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-10-19

Total views
1,028 ( #4,655 of 2,439,585 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
61 ( #11,142 of 2,439,585 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes