Rules work on one representation; similarity compares two representations

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):16-16 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Rules and similarity refer to qualitatively different processes. The classification of a stimulus by rules involves abstract and usually domain-specific knowledge operating primarily on the target representation. In contrast, similarity is a relation between the target representation and another representation of the same type. It is also useful to distinguish associationist processes as a third type of cognitive process.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 107,599

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The rules versus similarity distinction.Emmanuel M. Pothos - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):1-14.
Representation and Similarity: Suárez on Necessary and Sufficient Conditions of Scientific Representation.Michael Poznic - 2016 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 47 (2):331-347.
In search of radical similarity.Oscar Vilarroya - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):35-35.
The notion of distal similarity is ill defined.Ulrike Hahn & Nick Chater - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (4):474-475.
Rules, similarity, and threshold logic.Włodzisław Duch - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):23-23.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
69 (#348,620)

6 months
9 (#589,309)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?