Respect for Personal Autonomy, Human Dignity, and the Problems of Self-Directedness and Botched Autonomy

Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 36 (5):496-515 (2011)
This paper explores the value of respect for personal autonomy in relation to clearly immoral and irrational acts committed freely and intentionally by competent people. Following Berlin's distinction between two kinds of liberty and Darwall's two kinds of respect, it is argued that coercive suppression of nonautonomous, irrational, and self-harming acts of competent persons is offensive to their human dignity, but not disrespectful of personal autonomy. Irrational and immoral choices made by competent people may claim only the negative liberty to be left alone. Lives disposed to autonomy are worthy of solidarity and active support in addition to the right of free choice and action. Autonomous premeditated desires (distinguished from mere consent) may embody transcendental choices, which transcend consideration of physical and psychological well-being. Choices made by incompetent persons (e.g., children and the mentally disabled) are not related to autonomy, but to self-directedness. The value of human dignity confers protection to self-directedness, but not at the expense of other vital interests
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/jmp/jhr035
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 24,463
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Sreenivasan Gopal (2005). A Hybrid Theory of Claim-Rights. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 25 (2):257-274.

View all 10 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Y. M. Barilan (2012). Ulysses Contracts and the Nocebo Effect. American Journal of Bioethics 12 (3):37-39.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
John K. Davis (2004). Precedent Autonomy and Subsequent Consent. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 7 (3):267-291.
Matti Häyry (2007). The Tension Between Self-Governance and Absolute Inner Worth in Kant's Moral Philosophy. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 1 (11):153-157.
Maeve Cooke (1999). A Space of One's Own: Autonomy, Privacy, Liberty. Philosophy and Social Criticism 25 (1):22-53.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

31 ( #155,124 of 1,925,533 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

3 ( #254,979 of 1,925,533 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.