- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
The Upper Limits of Pain and Suffering in Animal Research
Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 24 (4):431-447 (2015)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Review of Tom L. Beauchamp and David DeGrazia PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL RESEARCH ETHICS. [REVIEW]Nathan Nobis - forthcoming - Bioethics.
Principles of animal research ethics Tom L. Beauchamp and David DeGrazia oxford university press: New York, 2020. 176 pp. isbn 9780190939120. Us$34.95. [REVIEW]Nathan Nobis - 2020 - Bioethics 34 (9):998-999.
Can We Do without Respect and Justice in Animal Research Ethics?Rebecca L. Walker - 2020 - Hastings Center Report 50 (5):46-47.
Nancy S. Jecker: Ethical Issues in Death and Dying, by Tom Beauchamp and Robert Veatch.T. R. McCormick - 1997 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 6:245-247.
Ethical Issues in Death and Dying, 2d. ed. Tom Beauchamp and Robert Veatch. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall, 1996. 458 pp. [REVIEW]Thomas R. McCormick - 1997 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 6 (2):245.
Response to Strong and Beauchamp.Rebecca Kukla - 2014 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 23 (1):99-103.
The Asymmetrical Contributions of Pleasure and Pain to Animal Welfare.Adam J. Shriver - 2014 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 23 (2):152-162.
Analytics
Added to PP
2016-02-04
Downloads
50 (#310,087)
6 months
7 (#591,670)
2016-02-04
Downloads
50 (#310,087)
6 months
7 (#591,670)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Animal Research that Respects Animal Rights: Extending Requirements for Research with Humans to Animals.Angela K. Martin - 2022 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 31 (1):59-72.
Scientific inertia in animal-based research in biomedicine.Simon Lohse - 2021 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 89 (C):41-51.
Integrating Philosophy of Science into Research on Ethical, Legal and Social Issues in the Life Sciences.Simon Lohse, Martin S. Wasmer & Thomas A. C. Reydon - 2020 - Perspectives on Science 28 (6):700-736.
The Emergence and Development of Animal Research Ethics: A Review with a Focus on Nonhuman Primates.Gardar Arnason - 2020 - Science and Engineering Ethics 26 (4):2277-2293.
A Considerably Common Morality: Catholic Ethics and Secular Principlism in Dialogue.John J. Fitzgerald - 2019 - Christian Bioethics 25 (1):86-127.
References found in this work
The Flaws and Human Harms of Animal Experimentation.Aysha Akhtar - 2015 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 24 (4):407-419.
Why the Debate over Minimal Risk Needs to be Reconsidered.Ariella Binik & Charles Weijer - 2014 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 39 (4):387-405.
Setting risk thresholds in biomedical research: lessons from the debate about minimal risk.Annette Rid - 2014 - Monash Bioethics Review 32 (1-2):63-85.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6686886f5-7g5mb uwo