The Porosity of Autonomy: Social and Biological Constitution of the Patient in Biomedicine

American Journal of Bioethics 16 (2):34-45 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The nature and role of the patient in biomedicine comprise issues central to bioethical inquiry. Given its developmental history grounded firmly in a backlash against 20th-century cases of egregious human subjects abuse, contemporary medical bioethics has come to rely on a fundamental assumption: the unit of care is the autonomous self-directing patient. In this article we examine first the structure of the feminist social critique of autonomy. Then we show that a parallel argument can be made against relational autonomy as well, demonstrating how this second concept of autonomy fails to take sufficiently into account an array of biological determinants, particularly those from microbial biology. Finally, in light of this biological critique, we question whether or to what extent any relevant and meaningful view of autonomy can be recovered in the contemporary landscape of bioethics

Similar books and articles

The Voices Missing from the Autonomy Discourse.Julia D. Gibson - 2019 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 12 (1):77-98.
Autonomy in Japan: What does it Look Like?Akira Akabayashi & Eisuke Nakazawa - 2022 - Asian Bioethics Review 14 (4):317-336.
Autonomy, Rationality, and Contemporary Bioethics.Jonathan Pugh - 2020 - Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
On feminist engagements with bioethics.Rada Drezgic - 2012 - Filozofija I Društvo 23 (4):19-31.
Relational Autonomy as a Theoretical Lens for Qualitative Health Research.Jennifer A. H. Bell - 2020 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 13 (2):69-92.
On feminist engagements with bioethics.Rada Drezgic - 2012 - Filozofija I Društvo 23 (4):19-31.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-04-30

Downloads
1,191 (#845)

6 months
138 (#132,853)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Jonathan Beever
University of Central Florida
Nicolae Morar
University of Oregon

Citations of this work

Bioethics and the Hypothesis of Extended Health.Nicolae Morar & Joshua August Skorburg - 2018 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 28 (3):341-376.
Nudging and the Ecological and Social Roots of Human Agency.Nicolae Morar & Daniel Kelly - 2016 - American Journal of Bioethics 16 (11):15-17.
The Myth of the Individual.Lorraine Code - 2016 - American Journal of Bioethics 16 (2):59-60.
Toward an Ecological Bioethics.Nicolae Morar & Joshua August Skorburg - 2016 - American Journal of Bioethics 16 (5):35-37.

View all 25 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Principles of biomedical ethics.Tom L. Beauchamp - 1979 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by James F. Childress.
Group agency: the possibility, design, and status of corporate agents.Christian List & Philip Pettit - 2011 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by Philip Pettit.
The ethics of care: personal, political, and global.Virginia Held - 2006 - New York: Oxford University Press.

View all 47 references / Add more references