Kantian Review 14 (2):67-92 (2010)
Like Kant's Critique of Pure Reason, we now have both an A- and a substantially revised B-edition of Henry Allison's commentary to and defence of that work: Kant's Transcendental Idealism: An Interpretation and Defense . Unlike Kant's Critique, however, Allison's first edition is unlikely to persist as an occasional rival to the second, since reviewers rightly consider the second to have superseded the landmark scholarship of the first. Nevertheless, before Allison's first edition is entirely supplanted, I would like to save a neglected insight from its treatment of the B-deduction that is not retained in the second edition
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Kant's Transcendental Idealism: An Interpretation and Defense.E. Allison Henry - 1984 - Philosophical Review 94 (1):134-136.
Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics.Martin Heidegger - 1962 - Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
The Second Step of the B‐Deduction.Frederick Rauscher - 2014 - European Journal of Philosophy 22 (3):396-419.
Similar books and articles
Kant on the Transcendental Deduction of Space and Time: An Essay on the Philosophical Resources of the Transcendental Aesthetic.Melissa McBay Merritt - 2010 - Kantian Review 14 (2):1-37.
Kant's Use of the Notions “Objective Reality” and “Objective Validity”.Ralf Meerbote - 1972 - Kant-Studien 63 (1-4):51-58.
Is There a Gap in Kant's B Deduction?Stefanie Grüne - 2011 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 19 (3):465 - 490.
Kant's Deduction and Apperception. Explaining the Categories.Dennis Schulting - 2012 - Palgrave-Macmillan.
Is Kant's Transcendental Deduction of the Categories Fit for Purpose?Anil Gomes - 2010 - Kantian Review 15 (2):118-137.
Added to index2010-08-16
Total downloads72 ( #70,875 of 2,153,485 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #280,610 of 2,153,485 )
How can I increase my downloads?