David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Inquiry 43 (1):91 – 110 (2000)
In response to Henry Allison's and Sally Sedwick's comments on my recent book, Kant and the Capacity to Judge, I explain Kant's description of the understanding as being essentially a "capacity to judge", and his view of the relationship between the categories and the logical functions of judgment. I defend my interpretation of Kant's argument in the Transcendental Deduction of the Categories in the B edition. I conclude that, in my interpretation, Kant's notions of the "a priori" and the "given" are more complex and flexible than is generally perceived. Nevertheless, Kant maintains a strict distinction between receptivity and spontaneity, the "passive" and the "active" aspects of our representational capacities. This separates him from his German idealist successors, most notably Fichte and Hegel. Contrary to Sedgwick's and Allison's suggestions, I do not think that my interpretation tends to blur this distinction.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Anil Gomes (2010). Is Kant's Transcendental Deduction of the Categories Fit for Purpose? Kantian Review 15 (2):118-137.
Similar books and articles
Paul Guyer & Henry E. Allison (2006). Dialogue: Paul Guyer and Henry Allison on Allison's Kant's Theory of Taste. In Rebecca Kukla (ed.), Aesthetics and Cognition in Kant's Critical Philosophy. Cambridge University Press
Béatrice Longuenesse (2001). Synthesis, Logical Forms, and the Objects of Our Ordinary Experience: Response to Michael Friedman. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 83 (2):199-212.
Karl Ameriks (1992). Kant and Hegel on Freedom: Two New Interpretations. Inquiry 35 (2):219 – 232.
Béatrice Longuenesse (2003). Kant's Theory of Judgment, and Judgments of Taste: On Henry Allison's "Kant's Theory of Taste". Inquiry 46 (2):143 – 163.
Henry E. Allison (1990). Kant's Theory of Freedom. Cambridge University Press.
Henry E. Allison (2001). Kant's Theory of Taste: A Reading of the Critique of Aesthetic Judgment. Cambridge University Press.
Lior Nitzan (2010). The Thought of an Object and the Object of Thought: A Critique of Henry E. Allison's 'Two Aspect' View. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 92 (2):176-198.
Henry E. Allison (1996). Idealism and Freedom: Essays on Kant's Theoretical and Practical Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
Sally Sedgwick (2000). Longuenesse on Kant and the Priority of the Capacity to Judge. Inquiry 43 (1):81 – 90.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads117 ( #37,701 of 1,903,102 )
Recent downloads (6 months)12 ( #71,116 of 1,903,102 )
How can I increase my downloads?