Beyond Neuroscience: Non-Experimental Arguments Against Commonly Held Ethical Beliefs

American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 1 (4):51-52 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,709

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analogical Reasoning in Ethics.Georg Spielthenner - 2014 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 17 (5):861-874.
Beliefs do not come in degrees.Andrew Moon - 2017 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 47 (6):760-778.
Epistemic virtues and transparency.Hilan Bensusan & Manuel De Pinedo - 2011 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 11 (3):257-266.
The faculty of intuition.Steven D. Hales - 2012 - Analytic Philosophy 53 (2):180-207.
Should Religious Beliefs Be Exempt from the Duty to Think Critically?Donald Hatcher - 2014 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 29 (1):17-31.
Interpreting intuition: Experimental philosophy of language.Jeffrey Maynes - 2015 - Philosophical Psychology 28 (2):260-278.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-06-22

Downloads
13 (#1,032,575)

6 months
3 (#965,065)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

James Delaney
Niagara University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Reasons and Persons.Joseph Margolis - 1986 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 47 (2):311-327.
How to Think about the Problem of Free Will.Peter van Inwagen - 2008 - The Journal of Ethics 12 (3-4):327 - 341.
How to Think about the Problem of Free Will.Peter Inwagen - 2008 - The Journal of Ethics 12 (3-4):327-341.

View all 6 references / Add more references