On Procreative Responsibility in Assisted and Collaborative Reproduction

Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16 (1):55-70 (2013)
Abstract
Abstract   It is common practice to regard participants in assisted and collaborative reproduction (gamete donors, embryologists, fertility doctors, etc.) as simply providing a desired biological product or medical service. These agents are not procreators in the ordinary sense, nor do they stand in any kind of meaningful parental relation to the resulting offspring. This paper challenges the common view by defending a principle of procreative responsibility and then demonstrating that this standard applies as much to those who provide reproductive assistance in the form of medical services or gametes, as it does to coital reproducers or intending parents. Drawing on vocabulary from the common law tradition, I suggest that it may be helpful to refer to the various participants in assisted and collaborative reproduction (ACR) as accessories to procreation. Referring to the participants in ACR as accessories to procreation highlights the fact that these agents are not just providing medical services or products. They are participating in a supply chain designed to bring about new persons. I conclude by arguing that regulative standards in the fertility industry should be structured such that they permit, facilitate, and encourage agents to satisfy the requirements of procreative responsibility. Content Type Journal Article Pages 1-16 DOI 10.1007/s10677-011-9330-7 Authors Melissa Seymour Fahmy, Department of Philosophy, University of Georgia, 107 Peabody Hall, Athens, GA 30602, USA Journal Ethical Theory and Moral Practice Online ISSN 1572-8447 Print ISSN 1386-2820
Keywords Procreation  Responsibility  Assisted Reproduction  Collaborative Reproduction  Gamete Donation
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10677-011-9330-7
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,749
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Reasons and Persons.Derek Parfit - 1984 - Oxford University Press.

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Surrogate Motherhood: A Trust-Based Approach.Katharina Beier - 2015 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 40 (6):633-652.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
The New Reproductive Technologies: Defying God's Dominion?Maura Anne Ryan - 1995 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 20 (4):419-438.
Third Party Assisted Conception: An African Perspective.Godfrey B. Tangwa - 2008 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29 (5):297-306.
Ethical Dilemmas in Assisted Reproduction.L. Regan & E. James - 1998 - Journal of Medical Ethics 24 (5):355-356.
Getting Beyond the Welfare of the Child in Assisted Reproduction.B. Solberg - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (6):373-376.
Human Embryos: The Debate on Assisted Reproduction.G. R. Dunstan - 1990 - Journal of Medical Ethics 16 (2):107-108.
Added to PP index
2011-12-29

Total downloads
44 ( #122,347 of 2,198,095 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #299,438 of 2,198,095 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature