Quine and the correspondence theory

Philosophical Review 83 (2):200-228 (1974)
Abstract
A correspondence theory of truth explains truth in terms of various correspondence relations (e.G., Reference) between words and the extralinguistic world. What are the consequences of quine's doctrine of indeterminacy for correspondence theories? in "ontological relativity" quine implicitly claims that correspondence theories are impossible; that is what the doctrine of 'relative reference' amounts to. But quine's doctrine of relative reference is incoherent. Those who think the indeterminacy thesis valid should not try to relativize reference, They should abandon the relation and replace it by certain more general correspondence relations between words and extralinguistic objects. Doing so will not interfere with the task of defining truth in terms of correspondence relations
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.2307/2184138
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,248
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Deconstructing Ontological Vagueness.Matti Eklund - 2008 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 38 (1):117-140.
The Limits of Conceptual Analysis.Laura Schroeter - 2004 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 85 (4):425-453.
On How to Avoid the Indeterminacy of Translation.Panu Raatikainen - 2005 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 43 (3):395-413.
Degree Supervaluational Logic.J. Robert G. Williams - 2011 - Review of Symbolic Logic 4 (1):130-149.
Two Conceptions of Truth? – Comment.V. Mc Gee - 2004 - Philosophical Studies 124 (1):71 - 104.

View all 12 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
The Domino Theory.J. M. Katz - 1990 - Philosophical Studies 58 (1-2):3-39.
Don't Forget About the Correspondence Theory of Truth.Marian David - 2004 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 82 (1):42 – 47.
In Defense of the Correspondence Theory.Theodore W. Schick - 1985 - Philosophy Research Archives 11:319-334.
Intrinsic Explanation and Field's Dispensabilist Strategy.Russell Marcus - 2013 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 21 (2):163-183.
Quine on Ethics.Folke Tersman - 1998 - Theoria 64 (1):84-98.
What is a Correspondence Theory of Truth?D. Patterson - 2003 - Synthese 137 (3):421 - 444.
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
118 ( #42,824 of 2,192,222 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #290,279 of 2,192,222 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature