- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Considering the causes and implications of ambivalence in using medicine for enhancement
American Journal of Bioethics 11 (1):15 - 17 (2011)
Abstract
This Article does not have an abstractAuthor's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “'Doctor, Would You Prescribe a Pill to Help Me…?'A National Survey of Physicians on Using Medicine for Human Enhancement”.Timothy D. Hotze, Kavita Shah, Emily E. Anderson & Matthew K. Wynia - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (1):W1 - W3.
Physicians prescribing “medicine” for enhancement: Why we should not and cannot overlook safety concerns.Katherine Drabiak-Syed - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (1):17 - 19.
The expressive meaning of enhancement.Adrienne M. Martin & Jehanna Peerzada - 2005 - American Journal of Bioethics 5 (3):25 – 27.
Human dispossession and human enhancement.Jason Scott Robert - 2005 - American Journal of Bioethics 5 (3):27 – 29.
Review of Richard Powers, Generosity: An Enhancement. [REVIEW]Tony Miksanek - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (11):31-32.
Neuroscience and Metaphysics.Chris Buford & Fritz Allhoff - 2007 - American Journal of Bioethics 7 (1):58-60.
The role of physician opinion in human enhancement.James J. Delaney & David P. Martin - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (1):19 - 20.
Sex and Enhancement: A Phenomenological–Existential View.Guy Widdershoven, Annemie Halsema & Jenny Slatman - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (7):20-22.
Defending the distinction between treatment and enhancement.Peter H. Schwartz - 2005 - American Journal of Bioethics 5 (3):17 – 19.
Analytics
Added to PP
2011-01-15
Downloads
42 (#368,610)
6 months
10 (#383,927)
2011-01-15
Downloads
42 (#368,610)
6 months
10 (#383,927)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Reasons for Comfort and Discomfort with Pharmacological Enhancement of Cognitive, Affective, and Social Domains.Laura Y. Cabrera, Nicholas S. Fitz & Peter B. Reiner - 2014 - Neuroethics 8 (2):93-106.
References found in this work
Cognitive enhancement, lifestyle choice or misuse of prescription drugs?Eric Racine & Cynthia Forlini - 2008 - Neuroethics 3 (1):1-4.
The use of methylphenidate among students: the future of enhancement?S. M. Outram - 2010 - Journal of Medical Ethics 36 (4):198-202.
“Doctor, Would You Prescribe a Pill to Help Me …?” A National Survey of Physicians on Using Medicine for Human Enhancement.Matthew K. Wynia, Emily E. Anderson, Kavita Shah & Timothy D. Hotze - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (1):3 - 13.
Begging the Question: Presupposing That TMS Can Be Shown to Enhance Eyewitness Testimony.Jayne C. Lucke & Wayne D. Hall - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 1 (3):34-35.
Autonomy and coercion in academic “cognitive enhancement” using methylphenidate: Perspectives of key stakeholders. [REVIEW]Cynthia Forlini & Eric Racine - 2009 - Neuroethics 2 (3):163-177.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6686886f5-kkm7k uwo