Street Photography Ethics

Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 25 (4):529-540 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper I examine the ethics of street photography. I firstly discuss the close-up ‘in-your-face’ style street photography made famous by American photographer, Bruce Gilden. In close-up street photography, the proximity of the camera to the subject and the element of surprise work in tandem to produce a striking and evocative picture. Close-up street photography is shown to be ethically contentious on wellbeing-related and autonomy-related grounds. I next examine the more orthodox ‘respectable distance’ kind of street photography. In orthodox street photography, the photographer positions the camera some distance away from a nonconsenting subject that may or may not be aware a picture is to be taken. The main ethical problem with this form of street photography relates to the subject’s vanity and sense of self. When street photographers produce and publish images without the consent of subjects, they express their own creative freedom at the expense of the subject’s right to editorial control. I discuss the scope and potentially demanding practical implications of a right to editorial control. To conclude, I offer a workable solution to the ethical dilemma facing street photographers and discuss the implications of smart phones and photo-sharing social media platforms.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,038

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Private lives, public places: Street photography ethics.A. D. Coleman - 1987 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 2 (2):60 – 66.
Street Art, the Discontinuity Thesis, and the Artworld.Jeanette Bicknell - forthcoming - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism.
Of Materiality and Meaning: The Illegality Condition in Street Art.Tony Chackal - 2016 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 74 (4):359-370.
Street Art: A Reply to Riggle.Andrea Baldini - 2016 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 74 (2):187-191.
Street Art and Consent.Sondra Bacharach - 2015 - British Journal of Aesthetics 55 (4):481-495.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-08-13

Downloads
44 (#361,747)

6 months
19 (#135,612)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John Hadley
Western Sydney University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

What Is the Right to Privacy?Andrei Marmor - 2015 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 43 (1):3-26.
Photography and Representation.Roger Scruton - 1981 - Critical Inquiry 7 (3):577-603.
Glass Panels and Peepholes: Nonhuman Animals and the Right to Privacy.Angie Pepper - 2020 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 101 (4):628-650.

View all 9 references / Add more references