Moral Action as Human Action: End and Object in Aquinas in Comparison with Abelard, Lombard, Albert, and Scotus
The Thomist 67 (1):73–94 (2003)
This article examines different medieval explanations of the causes of moral goodness, principally the end of the agent and the object of the action. Special attention is given to Thomas Aquinas, who considers the end (that which is willed) to be not only the origin of moral goodness, but also its main criterion. Peter Abelard, whose ethics I argue to be non-subjectivist, had developed a similar theory, though the vocabulary he uses is not very refined. By contrast, for Albert and Duns Scotus, the end is accidental to the moral act. The importance of this study is to shed light on the subjective and objective criteria by which to evaluate the morality of actions.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Aquinas and the Human Desire for Knowledge.Jan A. Aertsen - 2005 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 79 (3):411-430.
Intentio and Praeter Intentionem in the Constitution of the Moral Object in Thomas Aquinas.Andrew Jaspers - 2007 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 81:149-159.
Expanding in a Different Direction: Reclaiming the Twofold Nature of the Moral Object.Dana L. Dillon - 2011 - Heythrop Journal 53 (4):585-593.
Duns Scotus’s Action Theory in the Context of His Angelology.Tobias Hoffmann - 2010 - In Ludger Honnefelder (ed.), Johannes Duns Scotus 1308–2008: Die philosophischen Perspektiven seines Werkes / Investigations into his Philosophy. Proceedings of “The Quadruple Congress” on John Duns Scotus, part 3. Franciscan Institute Publications; Aschendorff.
The Specification of Human Actions in St. Thomas Aquinas.Joseph Pilsner - 2006 - Oxford University Press.
A Problem of Unity in St. Thomas’s Account of Human Action.Gerard Casey - 1987 - New Scholasticism 61 (2):146-161.
A Kantian Moral Duty for the Soon-to-Be Demented to Commit Suicide.Dennis R. Cooley - 2007 - American Journal of Bioethics 7 (6):37 – 44.
Responsibility, Passion, and Sin: A Reassessment of Abelard's Ethics.Jean Porter - 2000 - Journal of Religious Ethics 28 (3):367 - 394.
The Division of Action in Thomas Aquinas. Flannery - 2009 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 83 (3):421 - 440.
Scotus and Haecceitas, Aquinas and Esse.James B. Reichmann - 2006 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 80 (1):63-75.
Knowing Enough to Disagree: A New Response to the Moral Twin Earth Argument.Mark van Roojen - 2006 - In Russ Shafer-Landau (ed.), Oxford Studies in Metaethics, Volume 1. Clarendon Press. pp. 161-94.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2011-01-28
Total downloads1 ( #879,935 of 2,169,095 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #345,850 of 2,169,095 )
How can I increase my downloads?