Right, Wrong, and Rule‐Consequentialism

In Henry West (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to Mill's Utilitarianism. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 233–248 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This chapter contains section titled: Introduction The Consequentialist Argument for Rule‐Consequentialism The Reflective Equilibrium Argument for Rule‐Consequentialism The Focus on Internalization of Rules The Majority of People in Each New Generation Expected rather than Actual Value of Rules Distribution Old Objections New Objections.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,031

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Right, wrong, and rule-consequentialism.Bradford Hooker - 2006 - In H. West, Devin Henry & David Bourget (eds.), Blackwell Guide to Mill's Utilitarianism. Boston: Blackwell. pp. 233-248.
Climb Every Mountain?Michael Ridge - 2009 - In Jussi Suikkanen & John Cottingham (eds.), Essays on Derek Parfit's On what matters. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 79–96.
The Failure of Hooker’s Argument for Rule Consequentialism.Sanford Levy - 2014 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 11 (5):598-614.
Variable versus fixed-rate rule-utilitarianism.Brad Hooker & Guy Fletcher - 2008 - Philosophical Quarterly 58 (231):344–352.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-06-15

Downloads
3 (#1,728,269)

6 months
2 (#1,259,919)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Brad Hooker
University of Reading

Citations of this work

Should Utilitarianism Be Scalar?Gerald Lang - 2013 - Utilitas 25 (1):80-95.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references