Res Publica 24 (3):359-373 (2018)

Authors
Oscar Horta
Universidade de Santiago de Compostela
Abstract
There are many circumstances in which vegans are treated or considered worse than nonvegans, both in the private and the public sphere, either due to the presence of a bias against them or for structural reasons. For instance, vegans sometimes suffer harassment, have issues at their workplace, or find little vegan food available. In many cases they are forced to contribute to, or to participate in, animal exploitation against their will when states render it illegitimate to oppose or refuse to support some uses of animals. For the most part this remains socially invisible. Vegans, however, often recognize this as a form of discrimination against them. But they seldom campaign against it, as they regard it as a consequence of another and more important discrimination, i.e. speciesist discrimination against nonhuman animals. If this is correct, discrimination against vegans can be characterized as a form of second-order discrimination, that is, discrimination against those who oppose another form of discrimination. If speciesism really is unjustified and discriminatory, then discrimination against vegans will always be discriminatory and unjustified too. But even if our current attitudes towards animals were justified there would be strong reasons to claim that vegans do suffer several forms of private and public discrimination that are unjustified.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s11158-017-9356-3
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 53,548
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

A Case for Ethical Veganism.Tristram McPherson - 2014 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 11 (6):677-703.
Puppies, Pigs, and People: Eating Meat and Marginal Cases.Alastair Norcross - 2004 - Philosophical Perspectives 18 (1):229–245.

View all 13 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Badness of Discrimination.Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen - 2006 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 9 (2):167-185.
Compensatory Discrimination.J. P. Day - 1981 - Philosophy 56 (215):55 - 72.
Compensatory Discrimination.Patrick Day - 1981 - Philosophy 56:55.
Making Sense of Discrimination.Re'em Segev - 2014 - Ratio Juris 27 (1):47-78.
How Should Vegans Live?Xavier Cohen - 2015 - Journal of Practical Ethics 3 (2).
Direct Discrimination, Indirect Discrimination and Autonomy.Oran Doyle - 2007 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 27 (3):537-553.
Discrimination and Income Inequality.June Ellenoff O'Neill - 1987 - Social Philosophy and Policy 5 (1):169.
Direct Discrimination.Frej Klem Thomsen - 2018 - In Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen (ed.), Routledge Handbook of Discrimination. Milton Park: Routledge. pp. 19-29.
Improvement of Visual and Tactual Form Discrimination.Anne D. Pick - 1965 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 69 (4):331.
Statistical Discrimination.Annabelle Lever - 2016 - The Philosophers Magazine 7 (2).

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-06-02

Total views
79 ( #120,157 of 2,348,331 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #329,111 of 2,348,331 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes