The logic of how-questions

Synthese 166 (1):133 - 155 (2008)
Philosophers and scientists are concerned with the why and the how of things. Questions like the following are so much grist for the philosopher’s and scientist’s mill: How can we be free and yet live in a deterministic universe?, How do neural processes give rise to conscious experience?, Why does conscious experience accompany certain physiological events at all?, How is a three-dimensional perception of depth generated by a pair of two-dimensional retinal images?. Since Belnap and Steel’s pioneering work on the logic of questions, Van Fraassen has managed to apply their approach in constructing an account of the logic of why-questions. Comparatively little, by contrast, has been written on the logic of how-questions despite the apparent centrality of questions such as How is it possible for us to be both free and determined? to philosophical enterprise.1 In what follows I develop a logic for how-questions of various sorts including how-questions of cognitive resolution, how-questions of manner, how-questions of method, of means, and of mechanism.
Keywords Explanation  Questions  Determinable  Determinate  Goldman  Bennett  Kim  Van Fraassen  Belnap  Steel  Why  How  Erotetic logic  Manner  Means  Method  Mechanism  Possibility  Logic  Functional analysis  Event
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2009
DOI 10.1007/s11229-007-9269-3
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 26,627
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Brainstorms.Daniel C. Dennett - 1978 - MIT Press.
Supervenience and Mind.Jaegwon Kim - 1993 - Cambridge University Press.
A Theory of Human Action.Alvin I. Goldman - 1970 - Princeton University Press.
Mental Causation.Stephen Yablo - 1992 - Philosophical Review 101 (2):245-280.

View all 17 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
'By': A Refutation of the Anscombe Thesis.Benjamin Schnieder - 2008 - Linguistics and Philosophy 31 (6):649 - 669.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Reasoning to Hypotheses: Where Do Questions Come?Matti Sintonen - 2004 - Foundations of Science 9 (3):249-266.
Studies in the Philosophy of Logic and Knowledge.T. J. Smiley & Thomas Baldwin (eds.) - 2004 - Published for the British Academy by Oxford University Press.
On the Logic of Why-Questions.Matti Sintonen - 1984 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1984:168 - 176.
An Approach to Why-Questions.Antti Koura - 1988 - Synthese 74 (2):191 - 206.
A Logic of Questions and Answers.David Harrah - 1961 - Philosophy of Science 28 (1):40-46.
Explanation and the Theory of Questions.Charles B. Cross - 1991 - Erkenntnis 34 (2):237 - 260.
A Modal Interpretation of the Logic of Interrogation.Rani Nelken & Chung-Chieh Shan - 2006 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 15 (3):251-271.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

130 ( #36,193 of 2,157,997 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

4 ( #89,427 of 2,157,997 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums