American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 13 (2):98-100 (2022)
| Authors | |
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) |
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
| Categories | (categorize this paper) |
| DOI | 10.1080/21507740.2022.2048733 |
| Options |
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Request removal from index
|
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Altered Inheritance: Crispr and the Ethics of Human Genome Editing.Françoise Baylis - 2019 - Harvard University Press.
Mapping the Ethical Issues of Brain Organoid Research and Application.Tsutomu Sawai, Yoshiyuki Hayashi, Takuya Niikawa, Joshua Shepherd, Elizabeth Thomas, Tsung-Ling Lee, Alexandre Erler, Momoko Watanabe & Hideya Sakaguchi - 2022 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 13 (2):81-94.
Public Deliberation About Gene Editing in the Wild.Michael K. Gusmano, Gregory E. Kaebnick, Karen J. Maschke, Carolyn P. Neuhaus & Ben Curran Wills - 2021 - Hastings Center Report 51 (S2):2-10.
Empowering Indigenous Knowledge in Deliberations on Gene Editing in the Wild.Riley Taitingfong & Anika Ullah - 2021 - Hastings Center Report 51 (S2):74-84.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Debating Genome Editing Technologies.Lukas Kaelin - 2018 - In Matthias Braun, Hannah Schickl & Peter Dabrock (eds.), Between Moral Hazard and Legal Uncertainty: Ethical, Legal and Societal Challenges of Human Genome Editing. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. pp. 187-201.
Moral Limits of Brain Organoid Research.Julian J. Koplin & Julian Savulescu - 2019 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 47 (4):760-767.
Public Views on Gene Editing and its Uses.Hub Zwart, George Gaskell & Imre Bard - 2017 - Nature Biotechnology 35 (11):121-123.
The Public’s Ethical Issues with Brain Organoid Research and Application.John H. Evans - 2022 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 13 (2):101-103.
Genome Editing Animals and the Promise of Control in a (Post-) Anthropocentric World.Rosine Kelz - 2020 - Body and Society 26 (1):3-25.
Affected Genome Editing Crops: The Consequences of Genome-Edited Babies in China.Hao Li & San Yin - 2020 - Science and Engineering Ethics 26 (3):1847-1850.
Back to Basics: Application of the Principles of Bioethics to Heritable Genome Interventions.Landon J. Getz & Graham Dellaire - 2020 - Science and Engineering Ethics 26 (5):2735-2748.
Regulating Genome Editing: For an Enlightened Democratic Governance.Giulia Cavaliere, Katrien Devolder & Alberto Giubilini - 2019 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 28 (1):76-88.
Reproductive Genome Editing Interventions Are Therapeutic, Sometimes.César Palacios-González - 2021 - Bioethics 35 (6):557-562.
Media portrayal of ethical and social issues in brain organoid research.Abigail Presley, Leigh Ann Samsa & Veljko Dubljević - 2022 - Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 17 (1):1-14.
Deficits of Public Deliberation in U.S. Oversight for Gene Edited Organisms.Jennifer Kuzma - 2021 - Hastings Center Report 51 (S2):25-33.
Between Moral Hazard and Legal Uncertainty: Ethical, Legal and Societal Challenges of Human Genome Editing.Matthias Braun, Hannah Schickl & Peter Dabrock (eds.) - 2018 - Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.
Untangling the Promises of Human Genome Editing.Katherine Drabiak - 2018 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 46 (4):991-1009.
Genome Editing and Assisted Reproduction: Curing Embryos, Society or Prospective Parents?Giulia Cavaliere - 2018 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 21 (2):215-225.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2022-04-08
Total views
1 ( #1,546,110 of 2,507,563 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,983 of 2,507,563 )
2022-04-08
Total views
1 ( #1,546,110 of 2,507,563 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,983 of 2,507,563 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
