- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Is there a significant distintion between cognitive and social values?
Scientiae Studia 1 (2):121-149 (2003)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
'A epistemologia engajada de Hugh Lacey II' - Estudo crítico de 'Is science value free? Values and scientific understanding' (Hugh Lacey).Marcos Olivera - 2000 - Manuscrito 23 (1).
Hugh Lacey is science value free? Values and scientific understanding.Mary Tiles - 2000 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51 (4):953-955.
"a Epistemologia Engajada De Hugh Lacey Ii" - Estudo Crítico De "is Science Value Free? Values And Scientific Understanding". [REVIEW]Marcos De Olivera - 2000 - Manuscrito 23 (1):185-203.
Hugh Lacey, Is Science Value Free?: Values & Scientific Understanding. Routledge , xiv + 285 pp., $90.00. [REVIEW]Heather Douglas - 2002 - Philosophy of Science 69 (2):386-389.
Hugh Lacey, Is Science Value Free?: Values & Scientific Understanding. Routledge (1999), xiv + 285 pp., $90.00 (cloth). [REVIEW]Heather Douglas - 2002 - Philosophy of Science 69 (2):379-406.
Hugh Lacey, _Is Science Value Free?: Values & Scientific Understanding_ . Routledge (1999), xiv + 285 pp., $90.00 (cloth). [REVIEW]Heather Douglas - 2002 - Philosophy of Science 69 (2):379-406.
The context of implication: technological capacity and social values.Fernando Tula Molina - 2006 - Scientiae Studia 4 (3):473-484.
Hugh Lacey, Is Science Value Free?: Values & Scientific Understanding. Routledge (1999), xiv, 285 pp., $90.00 (cloth). [REVIEW]Philip Mirowski - 2002 - Philosophy of Science 69 (2):386-389.
Is There a Significant Distinction between Cognitive and Social Values?Hugh Lacey - 2004 - In Peter K. Machamer & Gereon Wolters (eds.), Science, Values, and Objectivity. University of Pittsburgh Press. pp. 24--51.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-03-23
Downloads
50 (#102,555)
6 months
4 (#1,635,958)
2014-03-23
Downloads
50 (#102,555)
6 months
4 (#1,635,958)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Social values influence the adequacy conditions of scientific theories: beyond inductive risk.Ingo Brigandt - 2015 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 45 (3):326-356.
The Interplay of Scientific Activity, Worldviews and Value Outlooks.Hugh Lacey - 2009 - Science & Education 18 (6-7):839-860.
Don't Ask, Look! Linguistic Corpora as a Tool for Conceptual Analysis.Roland Bluhm - 2013 - In Miguel Hoeltje, Thomas Spitzley & Wolfgang Spohn (eds.), Was dürfen wir glauben? Was sollen wir tun? Sektionsbeiträge des achten internationalen Kongresses der Gesellschaft für Analytische Philosophie e.V. DuEPublico. pp. 7-15.
Underdetermination and Theory-Ladenness Against Impartiality.Nicla Vassallo - 2015 - ProtoSociology 32:216-234.
Two Problems with the Socio-Relational Critique of Distributive Egalitarianism.Christian Seidel - 2013 - In Miguel Hoeltje, Thomas Spitzley & Wolfgang Spohn (eds.), Was dürfen wir glauben? Was sollen wir tun? Sektionsbeiträge des achten internationalen Kongresses der Gesellschaft für Analytische Philosophie e.V. DuEPublico. pp. 525-535.
References found in this work
Values in Science.Ernan McMullin - 1982 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982 (4):3-28.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6686886f5-2nz2h uwo