- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Thoughts on HPS: 20 years later
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 20 (1):9-13 (1989)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
More Thoughts on HPS: Another 20 Years Later.Jutta Schickore - 2011 - Perspectives on Science 19 (4):453-481.
Review of Arthur Donovan, Larry Laudan and Rachel Laudan: Scrutinizing Science: Empirical Studies of Scientific Change. [REVIEW]John Preston - 1994 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45 (4):1063-1065.
Scrutinizing science-empirical-studies of scientific change-Donovan, a, Laudan, l, Laudan, R.C. Howson - 1990 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 21 (1):173-179.
Progresso scientifico e naturalismo nella concezione di Larry Laudan.Lapo Ferrarese - 2018 - Pistoia: Petite plaisance.
Changing Fortunes of the Method of Hypothesis. [REVIEW]Andrew Lugg - 1984 - Erkenntnis 21 (3):433 - 438.
Historicism and the failure of HPS.Jouni-Matti Kuukkanen - 2016 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 55:3-11.
Historicism and Scientific Practice IScrutinizing Science: Empirical Studies of Scientific ChangeArthur Donovan Larry Laudan Rachel Laudan.Thomas Nickles - 1989 - Isis 80 (4):665-669.
Laudan on progress in science.John Losee - 1978 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 9 (4):333-340.
Science and Relativism: Some Key Controversies in the Philosophy of Science. Larry Laudan. [REVIEW]Jarrett Leplin - 1992 - Philosophy of Science 59 (4):713-714.
Book Review:Science and Hypothesis Larry Laudan. [REVIEW]Thomas Nickles - 1982 - Philosophy of Science 49 (4):653-.
Analytics
Added to PP
2010-09-02
Downloads
78 (#73,846)
6 months
8 (#1,326,708)
2010-09-02
Downloads
78 (#73,846)
6 months
8 (#1,326,708)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Narrative and evidence. How can case studies from the history of science support claims in the philosophy of science?Katherina Kinzel - 2015 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 49 (C):48-57.
More Thoughts on HPS: Another 20 Years Later.Jutta Schickore - 2011 - Perspectives on Science 19 (4):453-481.
Ways of Integrating History and Philosophy of Science.Theodore Arabatzis & Jutta Schickore - 2012 - Perspectives on Science 20 (4):395-408.
Explication Work for Science and Philosophy.Jutta Schickore - 2018 - Journal of the Philosophy of History 12 (2):191-211.
Obligation to Judge or Judging Obligations: The Integration of Philosophy and Science in Francophone Philosophy of Science.Massimiliano Simons - 2019 - In Emily Herring, Kevin Matthew Jones, Konstantin S. Kiprijanov & Laura M. Sellers (eds.), The Past, Present, and Future of Integrated History and Philosophy of Science. New York: Routledge. pp. 139-160.
References found in this work
Scientific change: Philosophical models and historical research.Larry Laudan, Arthur Donovan, Rachel Laudan, Peter Barker, Harold Brown, Jarrett Leplin, Paul Thagard & Steve Wykstra - 1986 - Synthese 69 (2):141 - 223.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-68866f4b87-lc8fp uwo