Brandom Beleaguered

We take it that Brandom’s sense of the geography is that our way of proceeding is more or less the first and his is more or less the second. But we think this way of describing the situation is both unclear and misleading, and we want to have this out right at the start. Our problem is that we don’t know what “you start with” means either in formulations like “you start with the content of words and proceed to the content of sentences” or in formulations like “you start with the content of sentences and you proceed to the content of words.” Brandom’s official view seems to be that he’s talking about explanatory priorities (see the preceding quote); but we think that can’t really be what he has in mind, and we can’t find any alternative interpretation that seems plausible. Speaking just for ourselves, we’re inclined towards a relatively pragmatic view of explanation; what explanation we should “start with” depends, inter alia, on what it’s an explanation of and whom it’s an explanation for. But, in any case, we would have thought that explanatory priority is of more than heuristic interest only if it reflects a priority of some other kind: ontological, semantical, psychological, or whatever. In talking about what one “starts with”, Brandom must be claiming more than
Keywords Analytic Philosophy  Contemporary Philosophy  Philosophy of Mind
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0031-8205
DOI 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2007.00045.x
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 35,954
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Concept of Mind.Gilbert Ryle - 1949 - Hutchinson & Co.
Two Dogmas of Empiricism.Willard V. O. Quine - 1951 - Philosophical Review 60 (1):20–43.
Analyticity Reconsidered.Paul Artin Boghossian - 1996 - Noûs 30 (3):360-391.

View all 9 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Semantic Minimalism and the “Miracle of Communication”.Endre Begby - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 165 (3):957-973.
Training and Learning.Michael Luntley - 2008 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 40 (5):695-711.
J. L. Austin and Literal Meaning.Nat Hansen - 2012 - European Journal of Philosophy 20 (4):617-632.
Training, Transformation and Education.David Bakhurst - 2015 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 76:301-327.
Training, Training, Training.Michael Luntley - 2012 - European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy 4 (2).

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Brandom's Demarcation of Logic.John MacFarlane - 2008 - Philosophical Topics 36 (2):55-62.
Brandom's Burdens: Compositionality and Inferentialism.Ernie Lepore & Jerry Fodor - 2001 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63 (2):465–481.
Brandom, Hegel and Inferentialism.Tom Rockmore - 2002 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 10 (4):429 – 447.
Beleaguered Tower.Rainulf A. Stelzmann - 1979 - Thought: Fordham University Quarterly 54 (4):430-431.
Brandom's Solution of Kripke's Puzzle.Carlo Penco - 1998 - [Papers on Line - Teaching Material].
Brandom on the Normativity of Meaning.Lionel Shapiro - 2004 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 68 (1):141-60.
Thoughts, Norms, and Discursive Practices: Commentary on Brandom.Allan F. Gibbard - 1996 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 56 (3):699-717.
Pragmatism and Inferentialism.John MacFarlane - 2010 - In Bernhard Weiss & Jeremy Wanderer (eds.), Reading Brandom: On Making It Explici. Routledge. pp. 81--95.


Added to PP index

Total downloads
86 ( #75,938 of 2,293,883 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #254,453 of 2,293,883 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature