Conceptual Learning: The Priority for Higher Education

British Journal of Educational Studies 53 (2):129 - 147 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The common sense notion of learning as the all-pervasive acquisition of new behaviour and knowledge, made vivid by experience, is an incomplete characterisation, because it assumes that the learning of behaviour and the learning of knowledge are indistinguishable, and that acquisition constitutes learning without reference to transfer. A psychological level of analysis is used to argue that conceptual learning should have priority in higher education.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,642

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Conceptual development and the paradox of learning.Michael Luntley - 2008 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 42 (1):1-14.
Conceptual Development and the Paradox of Learning.Michael Luntley - 2008 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 42 (1):1-14.
Discussion, Collaborative Knowledge Work and Epistemic Fluency.Peter Goodyear & Maria Zenios - 2007 - British Journal of Educational Studies 55 (4):351-368.
Reference framework for active learning in higher education.Pranav Naithani - 2008 - In Abdulla Al-Hawaj, Wajeeh Elali & E. H. Twizell (eds.), Higher Education in the Twenty-First Century: Issues and Challenges. Taylor & Francis Group. pp. 113-120.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
7 (#603,698)

6 months
67 (#235,714)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Discussion, Collaborative Knowledge Work and Epistemic Fluency.Peter Goodyear & Maria Zenios - 2007 - British Journal of Educational Studies 55 (4):351-368.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Effective Teaching in Higher Education.George Brown & Madeleine Atkins - 1989 - British Journal of Educational Studies 37 (1):86-87.
Scottish Education.T. G. K. Bryce & W. M. Humes - 2000 - British Journal of Educational Studies 48 (3):323-325.

Add more references