Scientific normativity as non-epistemic: A hidden Kuhnian legacy

Social Epistemology 17 (1):3 – 11 (2003)
Authors
Abstract
This Article does not have an abstract
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/0269112032000114804
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 38,062
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Fate of Knowledge.Helen Longino - 2002 - Princeton University Press.
The Essential Tension.T. S. Kuhn - 1977 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 31 (4):359-375.
Implicit Learning and Tacit Knowledge.Arthur S. Reber - 1989 - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 118 (3):219-235.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Intuitionism as a (Failed) Kuhnian Revolution in Mathematics.B. Pourciau - 2000 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 31 (2):297-329.
Hypothetical and Categorical Epistemic Normativity.Chase B. Wrenn - 2004 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 42 (2):273-290.
Epistemic Normativity.Stephen R. Grimm - 2009 - In Adrian Haddock, Alan Millar & Duncan Pritchard (eds.), Epistemic Value. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 243-264.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
27 ( #250,788 of 2,312,817 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #251,235 of 2,312,817 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature