Cognitive Science 34 (5):719-751 (2010)
AbstractA multimodal person representation contains information about what a person looks like and what a person sounds like. However, little is known about how children form these face-voice mappings. Here, we explored the possibility that two cognitive tools that guide word learning, a one-to-one mapping bias and fast mapping, also guide children’s learning about faces and voices. We taught 4- and 5-year-olds mappings between three individual faces and voices, then presented them with new faces and voices. In Experiment 1, we found that children rapidly learned face-voice mappings from just a few exposures, and furthermore spontaneously mapped novel faces to novel voices using a one-to-one mapping bias (that each face can produce only one voice). In Experiment 2, we found that children’s face-voice representations are abstract, generalizing to novel tokens of a person. In Experiment 3, we found that children retained in memory the face-voice mappings that they had generated via inference (i.e., they showed evidence of fast mapping), and used these newly formed representations to generate further mappings between new faces and voices. These findings suggest that preschoolers’ rapid learning about faces and voices may be aided by biases that are similar to those that support word learning
Similar books and articles
Preschoolers are sensitive to the speaker's knowledge when learning proper names.Paul Bloom - manuscript
Fast-mapping children vs. slow-mapping adults: Assumptions about words and concepts in two literatures.Gregory L. Murphy - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (6):1112-1113.
Viewpoint generalization in face recognition: The role of category-speci c processes.Shimon Edelman - unknown
Three- and four-year-olds spontaneously use others' past performance to guide their learning.Paul Bloom - 2008 - Cognition 107 (3):1018-1034.
The Invisible Smile: Living Without Facial Expression.Jonathan Cole & Henrietta Spalding - 2008 - Oxford University Press.
Could we please lose the mapping metaphor, please?Michael Tomasello - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (6):1119-1120.
Statistical learning of social signals and its implications for the social brain hypothesis.Hjalmar K. Turesson & Asif A. Ghazanfar - 2011 - Interaction Studies 12 (3):397-417.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Exclusion Constraints Facilitate Statistical Word Learning.Katherine Yoshida, Mijke Rhemtulla & Athena Vouloumanos - 2012 - Cognitive Science 36 (5):933-947.
References found in this work
Principles that are invoked in the acquisition of words, but not facts.Sandra R. Waxman & Amy E. Booth - 2000 - Cognition 77 (2):B33-B43.
Are there principles that apply only to the acquisition of words? A reply to Waxman and Booth.Paul Bloom & Lori Markson - 2001 - Cognition 78 (1):89-90.
Listen to your mother! The role of talker familiarity in infant streaming.B. Barker & R. Newman - 2004 - Cognition 94 (2):B45-B53.