Ethics and Information Technology 22 (4):297-305 (2020)

Authors
Lantz Fleming Miller
University of Twente
Abstract
Since the Nuremberg Code and the first Declaration of Helsinki, globally there has been increasing adoption and adherence to procedures for ensuring that human subjects in research are as well informed as possible of the study’s reasons and risks and voluntarily consent to serving as subject. To do otherwise is essentially viewed as violation of the human research subject’s legal and moral rights. However, with the recent philosophical concerns about responsible robotics, the limits and ambiguities of research-subjects ethical codes become apparent on the matter of constructing automata that maximally resemble human beings (as defined hereunder). In this case, the automata themselves, as products of research and development, are in the very process of their construction subjects of research and development. However, such research faces a paradox: The subjects cannot give their informed consent to this research for their own development, although their consent would be needed for the research. According to ethical codes, this research would be unethical. The article then explores whether the background concepts giving rise to this paradox could be reframed in order to allow such research to proceed ethically.
Keywords automata  ethical researcg  Helsinki Declaration  informed consent for research subjects  maximally humanlike automata  Nuremberg Code  responsible robotics
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s10676-017-9427-3
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Practical Ethics.Peter Singer - 1979 - Cambridge University Press.
Computing Machinery and Intelligence.Alan M. Turing - 1950 - Mind 59 (October):433-60.

View all 17 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Hard Problem of AI Rights.Adam J. Andreotta - 2021 - AI and Society 36 (1):19-32.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Re-Consenting Human Subjects: Ethical, Legal and Practical Issues.D. B. Resnik - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (11):656-657.
Reconsidering Consent and Biobanking.Emma C. Bullock & Heather Widdows - 2011 - Biobanks and Tissue Research The International Library of Ethics, Law and Technology 8:111-125.
Informed Consent in Pediatric Research.Lainie Friedman Ross - 2004 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 13 (4):346-358.
Informed Consent and Deception in Psychological Research.Philippe Patry - 2001 - Kriterion - Journal of Philosophy 14 (1):34-38.
The Consent Problem Within DNA Biobanks.Darren Shickle - 2006 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 37 (3):503-519.
Informed Consent In Gerontology.Rosana Glock & Josz Goldim - 2003 - Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics 13 (1):6-8.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-11-14

Total views
216 ( #44,340 of 2,432,204 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
162 ( #3,521 of 2,432,204 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes