Political Theory 38 (1):111-120 (2010)

Abizadeh has argued that because border controls coerce would-be immigrants and invade their autonomy, they are entitled to participate in the democratic institutions that impose those controls. In reply, the author distinguishes between coercion and prevention, shows that prevention need not undermine autonomy, and concludes that although border controls may restrict freedom, they do not give rise to democratic entitlements
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1177/0090591709348194
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,683
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Democratic Theory and Border Coercion.Arash Abizadeh - 2008 - Political Theory 36 (1):37-65.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Territorial Exclusion: An Argument Against Closed Borders.Daniel Weltman - 2021 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 19 (3):257-90.
Political Legitimacy.Fabienne Peter - 2010 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Coercion.Scott Anderson - 2011 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

View all 48 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Immigration, Rights and Democracy.Ben Saunders - 2011 - Theoria: A Journal of Social and Political Theory 58 (129):58-77.
Taking Moral Equality Seriously: Egalitarianism and Immigration Controls.Phillip Cole - 2012 - Journal of International Political Theory 8 (1-2):121-134.
Domination and Migration: An Alternative Approach to the Legitimacy of Migration Controls.Iseult Honohan - 2014 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 17 (1):31-48.


Added to PP index

Total views
140 ( #78,756 of 2,462,446 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #101,660 of 2,462,446 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes