Love and death

Journal of Philosophy 104 (6):301-316 (2007)
Abstract
Empirical evidence indicates that bereaved spouses are surprisingly muted in their responses to their loss, and that after a few months many of the bereaved return to their emotional baseline. Psychologists think this is good news: resilience is adaptive, and we should welcome evidence that there is less suffering in the world. I explore various reasons we might have for regretting our resilience, both because of what resilience tells us about our own significance vis-à-vis loved ones, and because resilience may render us incapable of comprehending how things really stand, valuewise. I also compare our actual dispositions to extreme alternatives (“sub-resilience” and “super-resilience”), and consider whether we might endorse (plain) resilience as a kind of mean.
Keywords Analytic Philosophy  Contemporary Philosophy
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0022-362X
DOI 10.5840/jphil2007104621
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 32,607
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Quality of Life Assessments, Cognitive Reliability, and Procreative Responsibility.Jason Marsh - 2014 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 89 (2):436-466.
Locating the People.Avery Kolers - forthcoming - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy:1-8.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
306 ( #12,489 of 2,235,862 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
10 ( #48,927 of 2,235,862 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature