Making research a requirement of treatment: Why we should sometimes let doctors pressure patients to participate in research
Hastings Center Report 35 (5):20-28 (2005)
Abstract
: When a patient could be offered one of multiple established treatments, doctors should be able to offer treatment only if the patient agrees to participate in research aimed at determining which of the treatments is most effective. Making treatment conditional on research participation will help researchers complete badly needed studiesMy notes
Similar books and articles
Trust and distrust in cpr decisions.Barbara Hayes - 2010 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 7 (1):111-122.
Stem cell treatments in china: Rethinking the patient role in the global bio‐economy.Haidan Chen & Herbert Gottweis - 2013 - Bioethics 27 (4):194-207.
Strategic Maneuvering in Treatment Decision-Making Discussions: Two Cases in Point. [REVIEW]Nanon Labrie - 2012 - Argumentation 26 (2):171-199.
Has emergency medicine research benefited patients? An ethical question.Kenneth V. Iserson - 2007 - Science and Engineering Ethics 13 (3):289-295.
Conducting clinical research in polish conditions.Marek Labon - 2006 - Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (1):185-188.
Turning failures into successes: A methodological shortcoming in empirical research on surrogate accuracy.Mats Johansson & Linus Broström - 2008 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29 (1):17-26.
Non-patient decision-making in medicine: The eclipse of altruism.Margaret P. Battin - 1985 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 10 (1):19-44.
Making decisions about life-sustaining medical treatment in patients with dementia.Arthur R. Derse - 1999 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 20 (1):55-67.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
32 (#366,892)
6 months
7 (#116,740)
2009-01-28
Downloads
32 (#366,892)
6 months
7 (#116,740)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
An Ethics Framework for a Learning Health Care System: A Departure from Traditional Research Ethics and Clinical Ethics.Ruth R. Faden, Nancy E. Kass, Steven N. Goodman, Peter Pronovost, Sean Tunis & Tom L. Beauchamp - 2013 - Hastings Center Report 43 (s1):16-27.
The Obligation to Participate in Biomedical Research.G. Owen Schaefer, Ezekiel J. Emanuel & Alan Wertheimer - 2009 - Journal of the American Medical Association 302 (1):67-72.
The Research‐Treatment Distinction: A Problematic Approach for Determining Which Activities Should Have Ethical Oversight.Nancy E. Kass, Ruth R. Faden, Steven N. Goodman, Peter Pronovost, Sean Tunis & Tom L. Beauchamp - 2013 - Hastings Center Report 43 (s1):4-15.
Manipulation in the Enrollment of Research Participants.Amulya Mandava & Joseph Millum - 2013 - Hastings Center Report 43 (2):38-47.
Does Consent Bias Research?Mark A. Rothstein & Abigail B. Shoben - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics 13 (4):27 - 37.
