Reply to Robert Kirk's and Andrew Melnyk's comments on my "Thinking about Consciousness"

Abstract
Reply to critics
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,349
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Physicalism and the First-Person Point of View: A Reply To Taliaferro and Goetz.Andrew Melnyk - 2007 - God or Blind Nature? Philosophers Debate the Evidence.
Thinking About Papineau's Thinking About Consciousness.Robert Kirk - 2002 - SWIF Philosophy of Mind [December 4 (1).
Consciousness and Concepts.Peter Carruthers - 1992 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 66 (66):41-59.
The Prospects for Kirk's Nonreductive Physicalism.Andrew Melnyk - 1998 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 76 (2):323-32.
Reply to Kirk and Melnyk.David Papineau - 2003 - SWIF Philosophy of Mind 4 (1).
Added to PP index
2010-07-26

Total downloads
8 ( #502,140 of 2,193,595 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #290,647 of 2,193,595 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature