Reply to Robert Kirk's and Andrew Melnyk's comments on my "Thinking about Consciousness"
Reply to critics
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Physicalism and the First-Person Point of View: A Reply To Taliaferro and Goetz.Andrew Melnyk - 2007 - God or Blind Nature? Philosophers Debate the Evidence.
How Reasons Explain Behaviour: Reply to Melnyk and Noordhof.Fred Dretske - 1996 - Mind and Language 11 (2):223-229.
Raw Feeling: A Philosophical Account of the Essence of Consciousness.Robert Kirk - 1994 - Oxford University Press.
A Reply to R. West's Comments on Leynes, Marsh, Hicks, Allen, and Mayhorn.P. Andrew Leynes - 2003 - Consciousness and Cognition 12 (1):25-30.
Thinking About Papineau's Thinking About Consciousness.Robert Kirk - 2002 - SWIF Philosophy of Mind [December 4 (1).
Consciousness and Concepts.Peter Carruthers - 1992 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 66 (66):41-59.
The Prospects for Kirk's Nonreductive Physicalism.Andrew Melnyk - 1998 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 76 (2):323-32.
Added to index2010-07-26
Total downloads8 ( #487,129 of 2,158,346 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #355,511 of 2,158,346 )
How can I increase my downloads?