The Modern Philosophical Resurrection of Teleology

The Monist 87 (1):3-51 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Many objects in the world have functions. Typewriters are for typing. Can-openers are for opening cans. Lawnmowers are for cutting grass. That is what these things are for. Every day around the world people attribute functions to objects. Some of the objects with functions are organs or parts of living organisms. Hearts are for pumping blood. Eyes are for seeing. Countless works in biology explain the “Form, Function, and Evolution of... ” everything from bee dances to elephant tusks to pandas’ ‘thumbs’. Many scientific explanations, in areas as diverse as psychology, sociology, economics, medical research, and neuroscience, rest on appeals to the function and/or malfunction of things or systems. They talk of how humans and other organisms or their parts work, what their functions are, why they are present, and how different situations will affect them and how they will react. Philosophers, going back to Aristotle, used to make generous use of functions in describing objects, organisms, their interactions, and even as the basis of ethics and metaphysics. And yet, since the Enlightenment, talk of the function of natural objects, teleological function, began to be viewed with suspicion, as the mechanical model of the world replaced the old Aristotelian model. From a religious standpoint, it used to be easy to see how objects in the natural world could have natural functions, for God was said to instill functions by design throughout Creation. But philosophers became increasingly reluctant to invoke God to solve every difficult philosophical problem, and became unwilling to indulge in such religious explanations of teleology.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Evolution: Teleology or chance? [REVIEW]F. J. K. Soontiëns - 1991 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 22 (1):133-141.
Together with the Body I Love.James F. Ross - 2001 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 75:1-18.
The Revision Theory of Resurrection.Eric Steinhart - 2008 - Religious Studies 44 (1):63-81.
Pagan teleology: Adaptational role and the philosophy of mind.Mark Perlman - 2002 - In Andre Ariew, Robert Cummins & Mark Perlman (eds.), Functions. Oxford University Press. pp. 263-290.
The ends of weather: Teleology in renaissance meteorology.Craig Martin - 2010 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 48 (3):259-282.
Teleology.Andrew Woodfield - 1976 - New York: Cambridge University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-02-21

Downloads
119 (#145,846)

6 months
7 (#350,235)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The Metaphysics of Artifacts: a critical rationalist approach.Alireza Mansouri & Emad Tayebi - 2023 - Journal of Philosophical Investigations 17 (42):151-167.
The dual nature of technical artefacts.Peter Kroes & Anthonie Meijers - 2006 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 37 (1):1-4.
Function, role and disposition in Basic Formal Ontology.Robert Arp & Barry Smith - 2008 - Proceedings of Bio-Ontologies Workshop, Intelligent Systems for Molecular Biology (ISMB), Toronto.

View all 44 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references