Cognitive Science 11 (4):481-518 (1987)

Abstract
There was a long tradition in philosophy according to which good reasoning had to be deductively valid. However, that tradition began to be questioned in the 1960’s, and is now thoroughly discredited. What caused its downfall was the recognition that many familiar kinds of reasoning are not deductively valid, but clearly confer justification on their conclusions. Here are some simple examples.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1207/s15516709cog1104_4
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 56,141
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Theory of Knowledge.Roderick M. Chisholm - 1966 - Englewood Cliffs, N.J., Prentice-Hall.
Change in View.Gilbert Harman - 1986 - MIT Press.

View all 18 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Mental Files.François Recanati - 2012 - Oxford University Press.
Reasons as Premises of Good Reasoning.Jonathan Way - 2017 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 98 (2).
What is Reasoning?Conor McHugh & Jonathan Way - 2018 - Mind 127 (505):167-196.
What is Good Reasoning?Conor McHugh & Jonathan Way - 2018 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research:153-174.

View all 170 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
192 ( #48,464 of 2,404,036 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
13 ( #53,461 of 2,404,036 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes