Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 70 (3):588–612 (2005)
In the Critique of Pure Reason Kant appears to characterize analytic judgments in four distinct ways: once in terms of “containment,” a second time in terms of “identity,” a third time in terms of the explicative–ampliative contrast, and a fourth time in terms of the notion of “cognizability in accordance with the principle of contradiction.” The paper asks: Which of these characterizations—or apparent characterizations—best captures Kant’s conception of analyticity in the first Critique? It suggests: “the second.” It argues, further, that Kant’s distinction is intended to apply only to judgments of subject–predicate form, and that the fourth alleged characterization is not properly speaking a characterization at all. These theses are defended in the course of a more general investigation of the distinction’s meaning, its epistemology, and its tenability.
|Keywords||analyticity analytic Kant analytic truth containment synthetic Quine Wolff Leibniz principle of contradiction|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Citations of this work BETA
Absolute Positing, the Frege Anticipation Thesis, and Kant's Definitions of Judgment.Timothy Rosenkoetter - 2010 - European Journal of Philosophy 18 (4):539-566.
Kant on the Acquisition of Geometrical Concepts.John J. Callanan - 2014 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 44 (5-6):580-604.
Similar books and articles
The Analytic-Synthetic Distinction and the Classical Model of Science: Kant, Bolzano and Frege.Willem R. de Jong - 2010 - Synthese 174 (2):237-261.
The Synthetic a Priori in Kant and German Idealism.Seung-Kee Lee - 2009 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 91 (3):288-328.
Implicit Thoughts: Quine, Frege and Kant on Analytic Propositions.Verena Mayer - 2003 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 66 (1):61-90.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads515 ( #3,216 of 2,168,955 )
Recent downloads (6 months)59 ( #3,432 of 2,168,955 )
How can I increase my downloads?