Lay attitudes toward deception in medicine: Theoretical considerations and empirical evidence

Ajob Empirical Bioethics 7 (1):31-38 (2016)
Guy Kahane
Oxford University
Jonathan Pugh
Oxford University
Background: There is a lack of empirical data on lay attitudes toward different sorts of deception in medicine. However, lay attitudes toward deception should be taken into account when we consider whether deception is ever permissible in a medical context. The objective of this study was to examine lay attitudes of U.S. citizens toward different sorts of deception across different medical contexts. Methods: A one-time online survey was administered to U.S. users of the Amazon “Mechanical Turk” website. Participants were asked to answer questions regarding a series of vignettes depicting different sorts of deception in medical care, as well as a question regarding their general attitudes toward truth-telling. Results: Of the 200 respondents, the majority found the use of placebos in different contexts to be acceptable following partial disclosure but found it to be unacceptable if it involved outright lying. Also, 55.5% of respondents supported the use of sham surgery in clinical research, although 55% claimed that it would be unacceptable to deceive patients in this research, even if this would improve the quality of the data from the study. Respondents supported fully informing patients about distressing medical information in different contexts, especially when the patient is suffering from a chronic condition. In addition, 42.5% of respondents believed that it is worse to deceive someone by providing the person with false information than it is to do so by giving the person true information that is likely to lead them to form a false belief, without telling them other important information that shows it to be false. However, 41.5% believed that the two methods of deception were morally equivalent. Conclusions: Respondents believed that some forms of deception were acceptable in some circumstances. While the majority of our respondents opposed outright lying in medical contexts, they were prepared to support partial disclosure and the use of placebos when it is in the patient's interests or when it is what the person would want. These results support the position that physicians should be allowed a greater degree of authority to make a professional judgment about whether deception might be morally warranted by the circumstances, provided that it doesn't involve outright lying.
Keywords Deception  Consent  Disclosure  Empirical Ethics
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/23294515.2015.1021494
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 38,097
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Principles of Biomedical Ethics.Tom L. Beauchamp - 1979 - Oxford University Press.
Telling the Truth.J. Jackson - 1991 - Journal of Medical Ethics 17 (1):5-9.
Sham Surgery: An Ethical Analysis.Franklin G. Miller - 2004 - Science and Engineering Ethics 10 (1):41-48.
Medicine, Lies and Deceptions.P. Benn - 2001 - Journal of Medical Ethics 27 (2):130-134.
On Lying and Deceiving.D. Bakhurst - 1992 - Journal of Medical Ethics 18 (2):63-66.

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Self-Deception and Shifts of Attention.Kevin Lynch - 2014 - Philosophical Explorations 17 (1):63-75.
Understanding and Explaining Real Self-Deception.Alfred R. Mele - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (1):127-134.
Are Empirical Evidence Claims a Priori?Peter Achinstein - 1995 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 46 (4):447-473.
A Critical Appraisal of Evidence‐Based Medicine: Some Ethical Considerations.M. Gupta - 2003 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 9 (2):111-121.
Pragmatically Pristine, the Dialogical Cause of Self-Deception.Colin T. Schmidt - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (1):126-126.
Belief, Deception, and Self-Deception.Rick Alan Fairbanks - 1990 - Dissertation, University of Minnesota
Complexity and Evolution: What Everybody Knows.Daniel W. McShea - 1991 - Biology and Philosophy 6 (3):303-324.
A Popperian Perspective of the Term 'Evidence‐Based Medicine'.Eyal Shahar - 1997 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 3 (2):109-116.


Added to PP index

Total views
39 ( #175,489 of 2,313,459 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #166,853 of 2,313,459 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature