Using Peer Instruction to Teach Philosophy, Logic, and Critical Thinking

Teaching Philosophy 32 (1):1-40 (2009)
Authors
Abstract
Peer Instruction is a simple and effective technique you can use to make lectures more interactive, more engaging, and more effective learning experiences. Although well known in science and mathematics, the technique appears to be little known in the humanities. In this paper, we explain how Peer Instruction can be applied in philosophy lectures. We report the results from our own experience of using Peer Instruction in undergraduate courses in philosophy, formal logic, and critical thinking. We have consistently found it to be a highly effective method of improving the lecture experience for both students and the lecturer
Keywords Philosophical pedagogy  Peer instruction  Teaching Critical thinking  Teaching Logic
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.5840/teachphil20093212
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Engaging the “Thumb Generation” with Clickers.John Immerwahr - 2009 - Teaching Philosophy 32 (3):233-245.
Conflicting Logics in Teaching Critical Thinking.Yoram Harpaz - 2010 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 25 (2):5-17.
How the Case Study Method of Instruction Employs Critical Thinking to Facilitate Learning.David M. Brown - 2005 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 24 (3):37-40.
Thinking Critically About Critical Thinking.Jennifer Wilson Mulnix - 2012 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 44 (5):464-479.
Instruction, Rationality and Learning to Be Moral.J. T. Hyland - 1986 - Journal of Moral Education 15 (2):127-138.
Using Cases to Improve the Critical Thinking Skills of Prospective Teachers.Linda K. Elksnin - 2005 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 24 (3):5-15.
The Principles and Practices of Peer Review.Ronald N. Kostoff - 1997 - Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (1):19-34.
The (In)Vocation of Learning: Heidegger's Education in Thinking.Jonathan Neufeld - 2012 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 31 (1):61-76.
What's Wrong with Didacticism?C. Repp - 2012 - British Journal of Aesthetics 52 (3):271-285.
The Dilemma of Ethics in Engineering Education.ron Newberry - 2004 - Science and Engineering Ethics 10 (2):343-351.
Reflections on Teaching Health Care Ethics on the Web.Toby L. Schonfeld - 2005 - Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (3):481-494.
Ethical Issues in Journal Peer-Review.J. Angelo Corlett - 2005 - Journal of Academic Ethics 2 (4):355-366.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-12-22

Total downloads
318 ( #13,706 of 2,302,572 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
47 ( #8,304 of 2,302,572 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature