Neuroethics 1 (1):19-30 (2008)

Authors
Adina Roskies
Dartmouth College
Abstract
Brain images are used both as scientific evidence and to illustrate the results of neuroimaging experiments. These images are apt to be viewed as photographs of brain activity, and in so viewing them people are prone to assume that they share the evidential characteristics of photographs. Photographs are epistemically compelling, and have a number of characteristics that underlie what I call their inferential proximity. Here I explore the aptness of the photography analogy, and argue that although neuroimaging does bear important similarities to photography, the details of the generation and analysis of neuroimages significantly complicate the relation of the image to the data. Neuroimages are not inferentially proximate, but their seeming so increases the potential for misinterpretation. This suggests caution in appealing to such images in the public domain.
Keywords Functional magnetic resonance imaging  Neuroimaging  Inferential distance
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s12152-007-9003-3
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 50,287
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

On Images: Their Structure and Content.John V. Kulvicki - 2006 - Oxford University Press UK.
On the Epistemic Value of Photographs.Jonathan Cohen & Aaron Meskin - 2004 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 62 (2):197–210.

View all 12 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 29 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
133 ( #65,903 of 2,325,533 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #296,748 of 2,325,533 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes