Three Challenges for the Cosmopolitan Governance of Technoscience


Promising new solutions or risking unprecedented harms, science and its technological affordances are increasingly portrayed as matters of global concern, requiring in-kind responses. In a wide range of recent discourses and global initiatives, from the International Summits on Human Gene Editing to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, experts and policymakers routinely invoke cosmopolitan aims. The common rhetoric of a shared human future or of one humanity, however, does not always correspond to practice. Global inequality and a lack of accountability within most institutional contexts of international governance render these cosmopolitan proclamations of ‘one human community’ incoherent and even harmful. More generally, there exists no shared normative standard for the cosmopolitan governance of science, with which such global initiatives could be evaluated. Taking a broadly philosophical perspective, the present paper aims to better understand this problem situation, identifying three high-level challenges global governance of technoscience: problematic ideals of technology and science, the unjust formation of “global” concerns, and the limitations of cosmopolitan theory. By holistically engaging these jointly empirical and normative sites of inquiry, scholars can better support humanity’s re-imagination of technoscientific practices within and beyond the nation-state.



External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Cosmopolitanism: ideals and realities.David Held - 2010 - Malden, MA: Polity Press.
The Cosmopolitanism Reader.Garrett Wallace Brown & David Held (eds.) - 2010 - Malden, MA: Polity.
Technoscience: “Where the Danger Is, Grows the Saving Power Also”.Lada V. Shipovalova - 2020 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 57 (1):45-50.
Cosmopolitanism and Justice.Simon Caney - 2009 - In Thomas Christiano & John Christman (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Political Philosophy. Oxford, UK: Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 385–407.
Gillian Brock, Global justice: a cosmopolitan account.Stan van Hooft - 2009 - Ethics and Global Politics 2 (4):369-382.
Cosmopolitan risk community and China’s climate governance.Joy Yueyue Zhang - 2015 - European Journal of Social Theory 18 (3):327-342.


Added to PP

109 (#131,774)

6 months
109 (#12,757)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Matthew Sample
Leibniz Universität Hannover

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations