Reichsrundschreiben 1931: Pre-nuremberg German regulations concerning new therapy and human experimentation
Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 8 (2):99-112 (1983)
Abstract
This is the first re-publication and first English translation of regulations concerning Human Experimentation which were binding law prior to and during the Third Reich, 1931 to 1945. The introduction briefly describes the duties of the Reichsgesundheitsamt, which formulated these regulations. It then outlines the basic concept of the Richtlinien for protecting subjects and patients on the one hand and for encouraging New Therapy and Human Experimentation on the other hand. Major issues, like personal responsibility of the physician or researcher, teaching of ethics of research and therapy, and research and therapy on vulnerable populations, are compared with the regulations in the Nuremberg Code and subsequent regulations influenced by the Nuremberg Code. CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us What's this?Author's Profile
DOI
10.1093/jmp/8.2.99
My notes
Similar books and articles
Human Subjects in Medical Experimentation: A Sociological Study of the Conduct and Regulation of Clinical Research.Bradford H. Gray - 1981 - R.E. Krieger Pub. Co..
The Nazi doctors and the Nuremberg Code: human rights in human experimentation.C. G. Foster - 1995 - Journal of Medical Ethics 21 (4):247-247.
Commentary: How do we think about the ethics of human germ-line genetic therapy?Kathleen Nolan - 1991 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (6):613-619.
Debunking the slippery slope argument against human germ-line Gene therapy.David Resnik - 1994 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 19 (1):23-40.
New Rules for Research with Human Participants?Jessica Berg & Nicole Deming - 2011 - Hastings Center Report 41 (6):10-11.
The Ethics and Politics of Human Experimentation.Paul Murray McNeill - 1993 - Cambridge University Press.
A playful approach to group therapy education.Robert Schulte & Mary Dluhy - 2012 - In Irene N. H. Harwood, Walter Stone & Malcolm Pines (eds.), Self Experiences in Group, Revisited: Affective Attachments, Intersubjective Regulations, and Human Understanding. Routledge.
Analytics
Added to PP
2010-08-14
Downloads
96 (#130,676)
6 months
7 (#118,276)
2010-08-14
Downloads
96 (#130,676)
6 months
7 (#118,276)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Research participants’ perceptions and views on consent for biobank research: a review of empirical data and ethical analysis.Flavio D'Abramo, Jan Schildmann & Jochen Vollmann - 2015 - BMC Medical Ethics 16 (1):60.
Medical ethics in the wake of the Holocaust: departing from a postwar paper by Ludwik Fleck.Eva Hedfors - 2007 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 38 (3):642-655.
An organizational perspective on ethics as a form of regulation.Klaus Hoeyer & Niels Lynöe - 2009 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 12 (4):385-392.
Medical ethics in the wake of the Holocaust: departing from a postwar paper by Ludwik Fleck.Eva Hedfors - 2007 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 38 (3):642-655.
Vulnerability in Human Subject Research: Existential State, not Category Designation.Stuart G. Finder - 2004 - American Journal of Bioethics 4 (3):68-70.