Authors
Thomas Schramme
Universität Hamburg
Abstract
The paper contrasts Lennart Nordenfelt’s normative theory of health with the naturalists’ point of view, especially in the version developed by Christopher Boorse. In the first part it defends Boorse’s analysis of disease against the charge that it falls short of its own standards by not being descriptive. The second part of the paper sets out to analyse the positive concept of health and introduces a distinction between a positive definition of health and a positive conception of health. An objection against Nordenfelt’s account is developed by making use of a specific example of an ambitious athlete. It is stated that Nordenfelt’s conceptualisation includes too many phenomena under the umbrella of ill health. An ideal conception of health like Nordenfelt’s is in danger of supporting medicalization. In conclusion, although Nordenfelt’s theory is not altogether rejected and even seen in congruence with Boorse’s account, it is claimed that the naturalistic framework should obtain conceptual priority.
Keywords Medicine & Public Health   Theory of Medicine/Bioethics   Medical Law   Ethics   History of Medicine
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2007
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s11019-006-9019-1
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,360
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Concepts of Health and Illness Revisited.Lennart Nordenfelt - 2006 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 10 (1):5-10.
An Agenda for Future Debate on Concepts of Health and Disease.George Khushf - 2007 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 10 (1):19-27.
A Qualified Defence of a Naturalist Theory of Health.Thomas Schramme - 2006 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 10 (1):11-17.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Is Natural Food Healthy?Helena Siipi - 2013 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 26 (4):797-812.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

A Qualified Defence of a Naturalist Theory of Health.Thomas Schramme - 2006 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 10 (1):11-17.
Nordenfelt's Theory of Disability.Steven D. Edwards - 1998 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 19 (1):89-100.
Dignity of the Elderly: An Introduction.Lennart Nordenfelt - 2003 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 6 (2):99-101.
A Two-Dimensional Theory of Health.Per-Anders Tengland - 2007 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 28 (4):257-284.
Mild Mania and the Theory of Health.Lennart Nordenfelt - 1995 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 2:179-185.
Introduction (Quality of Life).Lennart Nordenfelt - 1999 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 2 (1):3-10.
Towards a New Paradigm for Health Promotion.Lennart Nordenfelt - 2000 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 3 (3):315-317.
On the Circle of Health.Lennart Nordenfelt - 1984 - In Lennart Nordenfelt & B. I. B. Lindahl (eds.), Health, Disease, and Causal Explanations in Medicine. Reidel. pp. 15--23.
Concepts of Health and Their Consequences for Health Care.Lennart Nordenfelt - 1993 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 14 (4):277-285.
On the Comparative Approach to Defining Health: A Reply to Brülde.Lennart Nordenfelt - 2000 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 3 (3):307-310.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-12-01

Total views
42 ( #255,022 of 2,448,828 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #300,727 of 2,448,828 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes