Zur Infinitisierung der Automaten: Descartes und Leibniz

In J. Soering & R. Sorgg (eds.), Die Androiden: Zur Poetologie der Automaten. P. Lang. pp. p.85-98. (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The article compares Descartes’ and Leibniz’ use of the concept of a machine. For Descartes, the activity of the engineers rises to become the model for the scientific enterprise: one proceeds from the simple and the familiar to explain the complex. In this way one can escape the sheer astonishment about the complexity of the machines and their effects. This mechanical model is extended also to the explanation of the living beings. Also Leibniz regards living beings as machines. The difference between living and inanimate machines is that in the case of the former their parts are machine-like all the way down, to the infinite. Another peculiarity of the living machines is their infinite convolution that allows them to maintain their individual identity over time. The author also points to the self-similar character of the folds.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,069

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Descartes on Life and Sense.Ann Wilbur MacKenzie - 1989 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 19 (2):163 - 192.
Monads at the bottom, monads at the top, monads all over.Ohad Nachtomy - 2018 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 26 (1):197-207.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-07-27

Downloads
14 (#1,019,789)

6 months
2 (#1,259,626)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Daniel Schulthess
Université de Neuchâtel

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references