Reflection, nature, and moral law: The extent of Catharine Cockburn's lockeanism in her

Hypatia 22 (3):133-151 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

: This essay examines Catharine Cockburn's moral philosophy as it is developed in her Defence of Mr. Locke's Essay on Human Understanding. In this work, Cockburn argues that Locke's epistemological principles provide a foundation for the knowledge of natural law. Sheridan suggests that Cockburn's objective in defending Locke's moral epistemology was conditioned by her own prior commitment to a significantly un-Lockean theory of morality. In exploring Cockburn's views on morality in terms of their divergence from Locke's, the author hopes to underscore the extent of Cockburn's intellectual independence and her philosophical creativity

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,297

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
49 (#241,261)

6 months
2 (#298,943)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Patricia Sheridan
University of Guelph

References found in this work

Moral realism.Peter Railton - 1986 - Philosophical Review 95 (2):163-207.
An Essay Concerning Human Understanding.John Locke - 1979 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 169 (2):221-222.
New Essays on Human Understanding.G. W. LEIBNIZ - 1981 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 45 (3):489-490.
What difference does it make whether moral realism is true?Nicholas Sturgeon - 1986 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 24 (S1):115-141.
The British Moralists and the Internal 'Ought'.J. B. Schneewind - 1998 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 58 (4):992-995.

Add more references