Preempting Paradox

Logos and Episteme 3 (4):659-662 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Charlie Pelling has recently argued that two leading accounts of the norm of assertion, the truth account and a version of the knowledge account, invite paradoxand so must be false. Pelling’s arguments assume that an isolated utterance of the sentence “This assertion is improper” counts as making an assertion. I argue that this assumption is questionable.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,774

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Paradoxical Assertions: A Reply to Turri.Charlie Pelling - 2013 - Logos and Episteme 4 (2):239-241.
A Non-puzzle about Assertion and Truth.John Turri - 2020 - Logos and Episteme 11 (4):475-479.
A Note on Existentially Known Assertions.Ivan Milić - 2015 - Philosophical Quarterly 65 (261):813-821.
Unsafe Assertions.Martijn Blaauw & Jeroen de Ridder - 2012 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 90 (4):1-5.
Norms of assertion.Matthew Weiner - 2007 - Philosophy Compass 2 (2):187–195.
Moorean Sentences and the Norm of Assertion.Michael J. Shaffer - 2012 - Logos and Episteme 3 (4):653-658.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-01-11

Downloads
10 (#395,257)

6 months
3 (#1,723,834)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John Turri
University of Waterloo

Citations of this work

Knowledge and suberogatory assertion.John Turri - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 167 (3):557-567.
Knowledge and suberogatory assertion.John Turri - 2013 - Philosophical Studies (3):1-11.
You gotta believe.John Turri - 2013 - In Clayton Littlejohn & John Turri (eds.), Epistemic Norms: New Essays on Action, Belief, and Assertion. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 193-199.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references