Dokos 17:53-86 (2016)
AbstractThis paper looks at the centrality of action in social disciplines and examines the implications of this for whether social disciplines can be called scientific. Various reasons for calling social disciplines scientific are examined and rejected: (1) the claim that social disciplines are reducible to natural scientific ones, (2) the claim, from Donald Davidson, that reasons for action are to be construed in causal terms, (3) the claim that social disciplines employ, or should employ, the methodologies of the natural sciences. The question of progress in social disciplines will also be examined critically. Does the (apparent) lack of progress in social disciplines suggest that academics working in sociology, economics, politics, human geography, and philosophy should adopt the methods of natural science? My answer will be that it does not but nonetheless I will side with John Dupré against Hutchinson, Read, and Sharrock in claiming that social disciplines can properly be called scientific. There is such a thing as a social science.
Similar books and articles
For Science in the Social Sciences.Fay Brian - 2006 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 36 (2):227-240.
There Is No Such Thing as a Social Science: In Defence of Peter Winch.Pavel Stepantsov - 2010 - Russian Sociological Review 9 (3):129-150.
“Social Sciences” or “Disciplines of the Subject”?Pascal Verniory - 2013 - Human and Social Studies 2 (3):33-58.
Social Science: City Center or Leafy Suburb.John Dupré - 2016 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 46 (6):548-564.
Intentionality, Pluralism, and Redescription.Lee McIntyre - 2004 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 34 (4):493-505.
There is No Such Thing as Social Science: In Defence of Peter Winch. [REVIEW]Phil Hutchinson, Rupert Read & Wes Sharrock - 2009 - Analysis 69 (4):795-797.
Scientific Growth: Essays on the Social Organization and Ethos of Science.Joseph Ben-David & Gad Freudenthal (eds.) - 1991 - University of California Press.
Wittgenstein and the Social Sciences: Critical Reflections Concerning Peter Winch’s Interpretations and Appropriations of Wittgenstein’s Thought.Richard E. Flathman - 2000 - History of the Human Sciences 13 (2):1-15.
Wittgenstein Among the Sciences: Wittgensteinian Investigations Into the "Scientific Method".Rupert J. Read - 2011 - Ashgate.
There is No Such Thing as Social Science: In Defence of Peter Winch.K. J. Morris - 2009 - Analysis 69 (4):795-797.
Can Social Science Be Just?John Gilbert Gunnell - 2009 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 39 (4):595-621.
Methodological Individualism and Vertical Integration in the Social Sciences.Anthony Walsh - 1997 - Behavior and Philosophy 25 (2):121 - 136.
Philosophy of Social Science: A Contemporary Introduction.Mark Risjord - 2014 - Routledge.
Objectivity, Disagreement, and Projectibility.Paul Seabright - 1988 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 31 (1):25 – 51.
The Professionalization of Science Studies: Cutting Some Slack. [REVIEW]David L. Hull - 2000 - Biology and Philosophy 15 (1):61-91.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads