Philosophia Christi 11 (1):113-127 (2009)
I examine the central atheistic argument of Richard Dawkins’s book The God Delusion (“Dawkins’s Gambit”) and illustrate its failure. I further show that Dawkins’s Gambit is a fragment of a more comprehensive critique of theism found in David Hume’s Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion. Among the failings of Dawkins’s Gambit is that it is directed against a version of the God Hypothesis that few traditional monotheists hold. Hume’s critique is more challenging in that it targets versions of the God Hypothesis that are central to traditional monotheism. Theists and atheists should put away The God Delusion and pick up Hume’s Dialogues.
|Keywords||Dawkins Hume divine simplicity god delusion dialogues concerning natural religion|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
The “Who Designed the Designer?” Objection to Design Arguments.Lloyd Strickland - 2014 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 75 (2):87-100.
Similar books and articles
David Hume: Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion and Other Writings.Dorothy Coleman (ed.) - 2007 - Cambridge University Press.
Dawkins' God Less Delusion.J. Angelo Corlett - 2009 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 65 (3):125 - 138.
Playing Fast and Loose with Complexity: A Critique of Dawkins' Atheistic Argument From Improbability.Mark F. Sharlow - manuscript
David Hume: Principal Writings on Religion Including Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion and, the Natural History of Religion.J. C. A. Gaskin (ed.) - 1998/2009 - Oxford University Press.
Critical Study of Richard Dawkins, The God Delusion.Jerome Gellman - 2008 - Philo 11 (2):193-202.
Added to index2009-09-29
Total downloads2,321 ( #121 of 2,152,003 )
Recent downloads (6 months)188 ( #484 of 2,152,003 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.