7 found
Order:
  1.  23
    Argumentative Patterns in the Political Domain: The Case of European Parliamentary Committees of Inquiry.Corina Andone - 2016 - Argumentation 30 (1):45-60.
    In this paper, close attention is paid to the argumentative patterns resulting from combining pragmatic argumentation in which a recommendation is made with arguments in which the majority is invoked. I focus on such argumentative patterns as employed by European parliamentary committees of inquiry conducting inquiries into the activity of the Equitable Life Assurance Society. By incorporating legal and political insights about the activity of these parliamentary committees of inquiry into a pragma-dialectical argumentative approach, an analysis will be given of (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  2.  23
    Pragmatic Argumentation in European Practices of Political Accountability.Corina Andone - 2015 - Argumentation 29 (1):1-18.
    In this paper, the author examines the use of pragmatic argumentation in European practices of political accountability in which the politicians explain and justify a future course of action which they plan to undertake in order to solve an existing problem. The author explains some vital institutional characteristics of the practices under discussion and demonstrates how these institutional characteristics constrain the use of pragmatic argumentation. In addition, the author shows which criteria arguers commonly invoke in practices of political accountability to (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  3.  12
    Evading the Burden of Proof in European Union Soft Law Instruments: The Case of Commission Recommendations.Corina Andone & Sara Greco - 2018 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 31 (1):79-99.
    The European Union is making increased efforts to find simpler and more effective ways to function adequately in the eyes of its citizens by using ‘soft law’ instruments such as recommendations. Although they have no legally binding force, recommendations have practical and legal effects occurring partly due to their normative content in which a course of action is prescribed and further supported by arguments intended to persuade the addressees of a political position. Although recommendations function as persuasive instruments due to (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  4.  25
    Maneuvering with the Burden of Proof: Confrontational Strategies in Dealing with Political Accountability.Corina Andone - 2014 - Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 36 (1):59-78.
    In this paper, the author examines the burden of proof in the argu- mentative confrontations taking part in practices of political accountability. She does so by explaining how politicians maneuver strategically with the burden of proof in an attempt at winning the discussion in which they are involved. After making clear the role of the burden of proof in defining the difference of opinion in argumentative confrontations, the author outlines the constraints imposed by practices of political accountability on the burden (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  5.  62
    Comments on 'Legitimation and Strategic Maneuvering in the Political Field'.Corina Andone - 2008 - Argumentation 22 (3):419-421.
  6.  25
    Kristian Peters: Argument and Innovation. Theoretical and Empirical Explorations in Knowledge Claim Evaluation.Corina Andone - 2012 - Journal of Argumentation in Context 1 (3):387-390.
  7.  10
    M. A. Gilbert: Arguing with People: Broadway Press, Canada, 2014, 137 Pp.Corina Andone - 2018 - Argumentation 32 (3):461-462.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark