20 found
Order:
Disambiguations
Harold Zellner [13]Harold M. Zellner [4]Harold N. Zellner [3]Harold Marcellars Zellner [1]
  1.  18
    The Third Way: The Opening Move.Harold Zellner - 1981 - Philosophy Research Archives 7:623-643.
    After pointing out a meaning difference between "that which is possible not to be at some time is not" and "that which is possible not to be exists for only a finite time", we consider the assumptions necessary in a Thomistic context to derive the conclusion that if everything is contingent then at one time nothing was in existence. The needed key is in limiting the amount of matter which has ever existed, or, since "matter" is not a count-noun, that (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  2.  59
    “Is Relativism Self-Defeating?”.Harold Zellner - 1995 - Journal of Philosophical Research 20:287-295.
    Plato seems to have claimed that epistemological relativism is self-defeating in two ways. As reformulated by Siegel: arguments for relativism must be advanced as either relativistically or non-relativistically sound. In either case they are dialectically ineffective for the relativist. Second, relativism is either relativistically or non-relativistically true. Either choice commits the relativist to major concessions to her opponent, or so the story goes. But the relativist can advance her arguments as non-relativistically sound, for the consumption of the non-relativist. Moreover, relativists (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3.  15
    Required by a Rule.Harold Zellner - 1975 - Ethics 85 (2):164-169.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4.  23
    Spinoza's Temporal Argument for Actualism.Harold Zellner - 1988 - Philosophy Research Archives 14:303-309.
    In three places Spinoza presents an argument from (a) determinism and (b) God’s “eternity” to (c) “actualism”, i.e., the doctrine that this is (in some sense) the only possible world. That he does so shows that he distinguishes (a) from (c), which he has been thought to conflate. On one reading of ‘eternal’, he is claiming that an infinite past entails no other world was a “real” possibility. As might be expected, the argument is a failure, but it may help (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5.  13
    Utilitarianism and Derived Obligation.Harold M. Zellner - 1972 - Analysis 32 (4):124 - 125.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  6.  18
    Spinoza's Causal Likeness Principle.Harold Zellner - 1985 - Philosophy Research Archives 11:453-462.
    Axiom 4 of the Ethics of Spinoza runs:The knowledge (cognitio) of an effect depends upon and involves the knowledge of the cause.Since this is in the ancestry of some of Spinoza’s most important and characteristic claims, a clarification of its meaning would be highly desirable (in the literature it is left unhelpfully vague.) I argue that A4 is a causal likeness principle, according to which causal relationships always feature a property which in some sense is “passed” from the cause to (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  7. Assassination.Harold M. Zellner - 1977 - Religious Studies 13 (1):129-131.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  8.  3
    Is Relativism Self-Defeating?Harold Zellner - 1995 - Journal of Philosophical Research 20:287-295.
    Plato seems to have claimed that epistemological relativism is self-defeating in two ways. As reformulated by Siegel: arguments for relativism must be advanced as either relativistically or non-relativistically sound. In either case they are dialectically ineffective for the relativist. Second, relativism is either relativistically or non-relativistically true. Either choice commits the relativist to major concessions to her opponent, or so the story goes. But the relativist can advance her arguments as non-relativistically sound, for the consumption of the non-relativist. Moreover, relativists (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  9.  14
    A Note on R. M. Hare and the Paradox of the Good Samaritan.Harold Zellner - 1973 - Mind 82 (326):281-282.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  10.  5
    Sappho’s Sparrows.Harold Zellner - 2008 - Classical World: A Quarterly Journal on Antiquity 101 (4):435-442.
  11.  3
    Utilitarianism and derived obligation.Harold N. Zellner - 1972 - Erkenntnis 32 (4):124.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  12.  3
    The Cogito and the Diallelus.Harold Zellner - 1991 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 8 (1):15 - 25.
  13.  2
    Commanding The Impossible.Harold M. Zellner - 1971 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 4 (3):150-158.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  14.  2
    Spinoza's Puzzle.Harold Zellner - 1988 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 5 (3):233 - 243.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  15.  1
    Utilitarianism and Derived Obligation.Harold N. Zellner - 1972 - Analysis 32 (4):124.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  16.  1
    Utilitarianism and Derived Obligation.Harold N. Zellner & Alonso Church - 1972 - Analysis 32 (4):124.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  17.  1
    Utilitarianism and Derived Obligation.Harold Zellner - 1972 - Analysis 32 (4):124-125.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  18.  1
    Spinoza’s Causal Likeness Principle.Harold Zellner - 1985 - Philosophy Research Archives 11:453-462.
    Axiom 4 of the Ethics of Spinoza runs:The knowledge of an effect depends upon and involves the knowledge of the cause.Since this is in the ancestry of some of Spinoza’s most important and characteristic claims, a clarification of its meaning would be highly desirable I argue that A4 is a causal likeness principle, according to which causal relationships always feature a property which in some sense is “passed” from the cause to the effect. This interpretation provides a key to understanding (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  19.  1
    Spinoza’s Temporal Argument for Actualism.Harold Zellner - 1988 - Philosophy Research Archives 14:303-309.
    In three places Spinoza presents an argument from determinism and God’s “eternity” to “actualism”, i.e., the doctrine that this is the only possible world. That he does so shows that he distinguishes from, which he has been thought to conflate. On one reading of ‘eternal’, he is claiming that an infinite past entails no other world was a “real” possibility. As might be expected, the argument is a failure, but it may help explain why Spinoza holds that there are no (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  20. Assassination.Harold M. Zellner - 1978 - Critica 10 (30):89-93.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark