11 found
Order:
  1. Higher-Order Knowledge and Sensitivity.Jens Christian Bjerring & Lars Bo Gundersen - 2020 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 50 (3):339-349.
    It has recently been argued that a sensitivity theory of knowledge cannot account for intuitively appealing instances of higher-order knowledge. In this paper, we argue that it can once careful attention is paid to the methods or processes by which we typically form higher-order beliefs. We base our argument on what we take to be a well-motivated and commonsensical view on how higher-order knowledge is typically acquired, and we show how higher-order knowledge is possible in a sensitivity theory once this (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  2. Outline of a New Semantics for Counterfactuals.Lars Bo Gundersen - 2004 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 85 (1):1–20.
  3. Bird on Dispositions and Antidotes.Lars Bo Gundersen - 2000 - Philosophical Quarterly 50 (199):227-229.
    In The Philosophical Quarterly, 48 , Alexander Bird raises an objection against the conditional analysis of dispositions: where an ‘antidote’ is present all the supposed conditions for manifestation of a disposition are fulfilled but the manifestation does not occur. But Bird’s argument suffers from equivocation. If we spell out properly whether the disposition's conditions are to include the presence of the antidote or not, the apparent counter‐examples disappear. So his examples do not undermine the conditional analysis of dispositions; they show (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  4.  5
    Bird on Dispositions and Antidotes.Lars Bo Gundersen - 2000 - Philosophical Quarterly 50 (199):227-229.
    In The Philosophical Quarterly, 48, Alexander Bird raises an objection against the conditional analysis of dispositions: where an ‘antidote’ is present all the supposed conditions for manifestation of a disposition are fulfilled but the manifestation does not occur. But Bird’s argument suffers from equivocation. If we spell out properly whether the disposition's conditions are to include the presence of the antidote or not, the apparent counter‐examples disappear. So his examples do not undermine the conditional analysis of dispositions; they show merely (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  5. Disjunctivism, Contextualism and the Sceptical Aporia.Lars Bo Gundersen - 2009 - Synthese 171 (3):387-397.
    We know things that entail things we apparently cannot come to know. This is a problem for those of us who trust that knowledge is closed under entailment. In the paper I discuss the solutions to this problem offered by epistemic disjunctivism and contextualism. The contention is that neither of these theories has the resources to deal satisfactory with the problem.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  6. Knowledge and Conditionals.Lars Bo Gundersen - forthcoming - Mind.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  7. Tracking and Conditionals-A Reply to Smith.Lars Bo Gundersen - forthcoming - SATS.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  8.  21
    Contextualism, Disjunctivism and the Sceptical Aporia.Lars Bo Gundersen - 2009 - Synthese 171 (3):387-397.
    We know things that entail things we apparently cannot come to know. This is a problem for those of us who trust that knowledge is closed under entailment. In the paper I discuss the solutions to this problem offered by epistemic disjunctivism and contextualism. The contention is that neither of these theories has the resources to deal satisfactory with the problem.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  9.  15
    Counterfactuals and Tracking – A Reply to Smith.Lars Bo Gundersen - 2005 - SATS 6 (2):172-186.
  10.  2
    Dispositional Theories of Knowledge a Defence of Aetiological Foundationalism.Lars Bo Gundersen - 2003 - Routledge.
    This book offers an original examination of human cognition, arguing that cognitive skills are dispositional in nature. Opposing influential views in modern Anglo-American philosophy, Gundersen starts from the received premis that knowledge is analyzable in terms of belief, justification and truth, and goes on to clarify and improve on these ingredients' exact nature and internal association. Exploring a wide range of arguments offered by influential contributors in the field of modal epistemology, Gundersen argues that external conditions are secondary in developing (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  11.  4
    Goodman's Gruesome Modal Fallacy.Lars Bo Gundersen - 2000 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 76:447-462.